Biometric privacy and surveillance laws by state
30 laws on biometric data and surveillance enacted in 15 states in 2025 and 2026: facial recognition, biometric identifiers, license plate readers, workplace monitoring and traffic cameras. Each is listed by state with what it requires and a link to the text, followed by the bills that moved most recently.
- 30 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 15 states. Most: Virginia (6), Maryland (4), California (3).
- 319 bills in 45 jurisdictions, 24 of them in Congress. Latest action 23 October 2026.
Updated 26 October 2026LawsRecent billsBy state
Enacted in 2025 and 2026
30 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.
Alabama
Enacted
SB 118: Alabama Justice Information Commission; collection, dissemination, and use of biometric identifiers by certain entities provided for; Alabama Background Check Service established, types, uses, and fees for certain background checks for noncriminal justice purposes authorized; Alabama Rap Back Program established, penalties provided for; existing law relating to release of criminal history information repealed
Arresting agencies must obtain fingerprints, palm prints, mugshots, and descriptive information from arrested individuals and provide them to ALEA. Law enforcement and correctional agencies must report dispositions within 30 days when persons are released without charge or cleared. ALEA must establish the Alabama Background Check Service and may establish the Alabama Rap Back Program.
Arkansas
Enacted
SB 446: To amend the automatic license plate reader system act; and to provide for the use of automatic license plate readers by private landowners, private leaseholder, and commercial businesses.
Private landowners, private leaseholders, and commercial businesses may use automatic license plate readers to promote public safety, deter crime, and monitor access to private property, but must not preserve captured plate data for more than sixty days and must not sell, trade, or exchange such data for commercial purposes.
Enacted
HB 1148: To create the arkansas privacy act; and to address certain images captured by unmanned aircraft systems.
California
Enacted
AB 1331: Workplace surveillance.
Employers must not use workplace surveillance tools to monitor workers in bathrooms, locker rooms, changing areas, or lactation spaces. Employers must not use audio surveillance in employee-only breakrooms or cafeterias. Workers have the right to leave behind surveillance tools on their person when entering these areas, employee-only breakrooms, public bathrooms, or during off-duty hours, unless required by law to remain available.
Enacted
AB 1883: Workplace surveillance tools.
An employer shall not use a workplace surveillance tool to prevent compliance with laws, infer protected activity, make inferences about emotional state or gait, or collect neural data. An employer shall not use facial recognition technology to make inferences about a worker for firing, deactivation, or disciplinary purposes. An employer shall not use a workplace surveillance tool to infer a worker's protected status.
Enacted
AB 45: Privacy: health data: location and research.
Persons must not collect, use, disclose, sell, share, or retain personal information of natural persons physically located at or within a precise geolocation of a family planning center, except as necessary to perform requested services or goods. Persons must not geofence entities providing in-person health care services in California to identify, track, collect information from, or send notifications or advertisements to persons seeking or providing health care services.
Colorado
Enacted
SB 25-143: Extend Prohibition on School Facial Recognition
Schools and school contractors must not process biometric identifiers without obtaining opt-in consent on a stand-alone form that specifies collection, use, and retention. Schools must retain biometric identifiers no longer than eighteen months. Schools using facial recognition for safety must disable the system immediately after identifying the individual and develop policies designating authorized personnel.
Connecticut
Enacted
SB 472: An act concerning the electronic surveillance of employees.
Employers must give prior written notice to employees about electronic monitoring types and specific locations before monitoring occurs, except when the employer has reasonable grounds to believe employees are engaged in illegal conduct, violate legal rights, or create hostile workplace environments. Employers must provide new hires with a plain language statement about prohibited activities that may be monitored without notice.
Enacted
SB 439: An act concerning electronic surveillance devices and systems and self-service kiosks in employee lounges.
Employers must not operate electronic surveillance devices or systems in employee lounges, restrooms, or locker rooms. Exception: employers may operate surveillance in lounges if a self-service kiosk is present, provided the system records no audio and only records the kiosk area.
Enacted
SB 397: An act concerning democracy and government accountability and the use and retention of data derived from automated license plate reader systems.
Peace officers must not wear facial coverings or personal disguises while performing law enforcement duties except for specified health, safety, or undercover purposes. Peace officers must be clearly identified by badge and name tag on their uniform. Peace officers cannot detain, arrest, or take individuals into custody based on civil offenses in protected areas, state facilities, or municipal facilities without a judicial warrant.
Hawaii
Enacted
SB 888: Relating to consumer protection.
An operator of a smart household security device shall not share user data with a law enforcement agency unless the user provides written consent or the agency provides a judicial warrant. An operator shall not require user consent to data sharing as a condition of device use and must clearly inform users that refusing consent will not terminate their ability to use the device.
Enacted
HB 1231: Relating to traffic safety.
The State and any county shall not use facial recognition software with any photo red light imaging detector system, automated speed enforcement system, or other camera monitoring an outdoor public space. The State highway safety and modernization council shall recommend twenty-five dangerous intersections for photo red light imaging detector systems, and the safe routes to school advisory committee shall recommend twenty-five dangerous school zones for automated speed enforcement systems.
Idaho
Enacted
S 1180: TRANSPORTATION – Amends and adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding the use of automated license plate readers and their data and to provide for vehicles equipped with front license plate mounting brackets.
Agencies may use automated license plate readers only for law enforcement purposes (felony or misdemeanor investigation, traffic accidents, missing or endangered persons), traffic flow analysis, or both. Agencies shall limit data access to authorized personnel, implement access controls, conduct mandatory training, log all data access with user identity and purpose, and conduct semiannual audits.
Kentucky
Enacted
HB 58: AN ACT relating to privacy protection.
Individuals, entities, partnerships, corporations, associations, and public agencies must not deploy or maintain automated license plate readers except for parking regulation, secured area access control, public safety and crime deterrence, law enforcement purposes, or toll collection. Captured license plate data must not be preserved beyond ninety days unless retained as evidence or subject to subpoena. Law enforcement agencies must adopt written policies governing ALPR use and conduct audits every ninety days.
Maryland
Enacted
HB 236: Peace Orders and Criminal Harassment - Intentional Visual Surveillance
A person may not conduct visual surveillance of an area of another's residence where the other has a reasonable expectation of privacy with intent to harass, alarm, or annoy, after receiving a reasonable warning to stop, and without a legal purpose. A petitioner may seek a peace order against a respondent who has conducted such intentional visual surveillance.
Enacted
HB 516: Motor Vehicles - Automated Enforcement Programs - Privacy Protections
Agencies operating automated enforcement programs must deny public inspection of recorded images except as specified. Agencies may not access or use recorded images without a warrant, subpoena, or court order unless for appropriate traffic enforcement or law enforcement purposes. Agencies must immediately destroy images not constituting evidence of violations and retain violation evidence only up to 6 months or until conclusion of related proceedings. Agencies must adopt procedures for authorized personnel access, audit processes, personnel screening, secure storage, and image destruction.
Enacted
SB 381: Motor Vehicles - Automated Enforcement Programs - Privacy Protections
Agencies operating automated enforcement programs must deny public inspection of recorded images except for persons cited, their attorneys, and in investigations of civil liability. Agencies may not access or use recorded images without warrant, subpoena, or court order unless for appropriate traffic enforcement purposes. Agencies must immediately destroy images not constituting violations and retain violation evidence for up to 6 months or until adjudication concludes, whichever is earlier, but no longer than 5 years. Automated enforcement systems may not use facial recognition technology.
Enacted
SB 92: Peace Orders and Criminal Harassment - Intentional Visual Surveillance
A person may not conduct visual surveillance of an area of another's residence where the other has a reasonable expectation of privacy with intent to harass, alarm, or annoy, after receiving a reasonable warning to stop, and without a legal purpose. A petitioner may seek a peace order against a respondent who has conducted such intentional visual surveillance.
Montana
Enacted
SB 163: Generally revise privacy laws related to biometric, genetic, and neural data
Entities that collect genetic or neurotechnology data must obtain express consent from consumers before collection, use, or disclosure; provide privacy notices; implement security programs; and allow consumers to access, delete, and revoke consent for their data. Entities may not disclose such data to insurers or employers without express consent. Government agencies may not search consumer DNA or neurotechnology databases without a search warrant or investigative subpoena.
Oregon
Enacted
SB 1516: Relating to public safety; and declaring an emergency.
Law enforcement agencies must establish and publish policies for automated license plate recognition systems before deployment, including security requirements, training, retention limits, and hot list accuracy standards. Agencies may use ALPR systems only for specified law enforcement purposes: identifying vehicles used in crimes, violations, or associated with outstanding warrants or missing persons; identifying uninsured or unregistered vehicles; regulating parking; or controlling secured area access. Captured license plate data unrelated to court proceedings or investigations must be retained no more than 30 days. Vendors must provide monthly and quarterly audits to agencies, which must publish audit results within two days.
Enacted
HB 2008: Relating to consumer protection.
Tennessee
Enacted
HB 1316: Driver Licenses - As enacted, prohibits the use of digital driver licenses and digital photo identification licenses for voter identification purposes; regulates the use, retention, and disclosure of data submitted by persons participating in the digital driver license system, including biometric identifiers; prohibits geolocation data from being collected for purposes of the digital driver license system; revises other provisions related to driver licenses. - Amends TCA Section 2-7-112 and Title 55, Chapter 50.
The department and entities contracting with the department must not collect geolocation data for the digital driver license system. They must destroy biometric identifiers within three calendar days and retain other data no longer than three calendar days. Digital driver licenses must not be accepted for voter identification purposes.
Utah
Enacted
SB 183: Surveillance Camera Amendments
A law enforcement officer, or an individual acting on behalf of a law enforcement officer, may not tamper with, change the viewing direction of, or disable a person's surveillance camera on the person's private property, except with the person's permission, a court order, or under exigent circumstances or safety risks if the officer notifies the person within 24 hours or obtains a court order.
Vermont
Enacted
S 71: An act relating to consumer data privacy and online surveillance
Controllers must limit personal data collection to what is reasonably necessary, establish data security practices, and provide consumers rights to access, correct, delete, and port their data. Controllers must obtain consent before selling consumer health data and cannot use geofences within 1,750 feet of health care facilities to track consumers.
Virginia
Enacted
SB 338: Consumer Data Protection Act; data controller responsibilities, precise geolocation data.
Enacted
SB 84: Photo speed monitoring devices, etc.; placement and operation, civil penalty, report.
State and local law-enforcement agencies may place and operate photo speed monitoring devices in school crossing zones and highway work zones where workers are present, and at high-risk intersection segments. Agencies may also operate pedestrian crossing violation monitoring systems and stop sign violation monitoring systems in school crossing zones and highway work zones. Agencies must place at least two conspicuous signs within 1,000 feet of monitored zones, with one being a speed display sign for photo speed devices. Agencies must report annually to the Department of State Police on violations prosecuted, successful prosecutions, operating costs, and civil penalties collected.
Enacted
HB 55: Noise abatement monitoring systems; local authorities to place and operate, civil penalties.
Local governing bodies in Planning Districts 8, 9, or 15 may place and operate noise abatement monitoring systems to record exhaust system violations exceeding 95 A-weighted decibels or violating local ordinances. Vehicle operators found liable must pay civil penalties not exceeding $100. Localities must post system locations online and annually report violations and penalties collected.
Enacted
HB 971: College student-athletes; biometric data, protections and limitations.
Institutions must not disclose enrolled student-athletes' biometric data to outside individuals or entities without prior written consent. No individual or entity may make possession, use, ownership of, or rights to student-athlete biometric data a condition of any contract for name, image, or likeness rights without separate prior written consent.
Enacted
HB 2724: Automatic license plate recognition systems; use, reports, penalty.
Law-enforcement agencies must use automatic license plate recognition systems only for active criminal investigations, missing or endangered persons, human trafficking investigations, or to receive notifications about specific categories of persons or vehicles. Agencies must purge system data after 30 days unless part of ongoing proceedings, maintain audit trails, establish governing policies, and report annually to the Department of State Police.
Enacted
HB 2725: Surveillance technology; reporting by state/local law-enforcement agencies & sheriff's departments.
All state and local law-enforcement agencies and sheriff's departments must provide to the Department an annual list by November 1 of each year of all surveillance technologies used, accessed, or procured during the previous fiscal year, including technologies owned by the agency and those accessed from other entities.
Bills that moved most recently
The 25 open biometric privacy and surveillance bills with the latest action. The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker follows all 319.
New York A 10808: Relates to automatic license plate reader systems
In committee
Congress H.R. 10900: To require States and units of local government that receive funds under the Byrne grant program or the COPS grant program to submit a report to the Attorney General related to the use of automated license plate readers by State and local law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
In committee
Congress H.R. 10905: To prohibit individualized pricing, dynamic pricing, and pricing based on facial recognition technology at large retail food stores and their online platforms, and for other purposes.
In committee
Pennsylvania HB 2771: An Act amending Title 75 (Vehicles) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, providing for automated license plate reader systems; and imposing penalties.
Passed chamber
New Jersey A 5637: Concerns automated license plate readers.
In committee
Illinois HB 5151: Auto license plate recognition
In committee
Congress H.R. 10822: To restrict the usage of automated license plate reader system by governmental entities, and for other purposes.
In committee
Pennsylvania HB 2603: An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in wiretapping and electronic surveillance, providing for wearable recording devices; and imposing penalties.
Passed committee
New Hampshire SB 519: relative to the use of unmanned aerial systems.
Passed chamber
Pennsylvania HB 2825: An Act amending Title 44 (Law and Justice) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, providing for automated license plate reader systems; imposing duties on the Pennsylvania State Police; and imposing penalties.
In committee
District of Columbia B 26-0667: Surveillance Pricing Prohibition Amendment Act of 2026
In committee
New Jersey S 4075: Regulates use of artificial intelligence-based systems for electronic monitoring regarding employment and public services.
Passed committee
New Jersey S 4645: Prohibits private use and regulates government use of automated license plate readers.
In committee
Congress H.R. 10691: Ban Flock Act
In committee
Ohio SB 469: Regulate use of automated license plate recognition systems
In committee
Michigan HB 6411: Law enforcement: other; regulations for license plate reader systems; provide for. Amends 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.1 - 257.923) by adding sec. 256a. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6412'26
In committee
Michigan HB 6412: Law enforcement: other; regulations for license plate reader systems; provide for. Amends 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.1 - 257.923) by adding sec. 256b. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6411'26
In committee
Congress H.R. 10563: Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act of 2026
In committee
Congress H.R. 10609: Don’t Spy On Me Act of 2026
In committee
Congress S. 5544: Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act of 2026
In committee
New Jersey A 5481: Limits retention period for automated license plate reader data.
In committee
Ohio HB 1010: Enact the Ohio Freedom from Mass Surveillance Act
Introduced
Ohio HB 1011: Enact the 1984 No More Act
Introduced
Congress H.R. 10221: Flock-Off Act
In committee
California SB 1013: Automated license plate recognition systems.
Passed chamber
Biometric privacy and surveillance laws, state by state
- New Jersey31 bills
- New York28 bills
- Congress24 bills
- Minnesota18 bills
- Illinois17 bills
- Virginia17 bills, 6 enacted
- Maryland13 bills, 4 enacted
- California11 bills, 3 enacted
- Missouri11 bills
- Iowa10 bills
- Montana10 bills, 1 enacted
- Massachusetts9 bills
- Rhode Island9 bills
- Connecticut8 bills, 3 enacted
- Pennsylvania8 bills
- Colorado6 bills, 1 enacted
- Hawaii6 bills, 2 enacted
- Michigan6 bills
- Nebraska6 bills
- Tennessee6 bills, 1 enacted
- Texas6 bills
- Kentucky5 bills, 1 enacted
- Utah5 bills, 1 enacted
- West Virginia5 bills
- Alabama4 bills, 1 enacted
- Ohio4 bills
- South Carolina4 bills
- Vermont4 bills, 1 enacted
- Arizona3 bills
- Arkansas2 bills, 2 enacted
- Georgia2 bills
- Idaho2 bills, 1 enacted
- New Mexico2 bills
- Oklahoma2 bills
- Oregon2 bills, 2 enacted
- Washington2 bills
- Wisconsin2 bills
- Wyoming2 bills
- District of Columbia1 bill
- Indiana1 bill
- Louisiana1 bill
- Mississippi1 bill
- North Carolina1 bill
- North Dakota1 bill
- New Hampshire1 bill
Questions
Which states have biometric privacy laws?
States that enacted biometric or surveillance privacy laws in 2025 and 2026: Virginia (6), Maryland (4), California (3), Connecticut (3), Arkansas (2), Hawaii (2), Oregon (2), Alabama (1), Colorado (1), Idaho (1), Kentucky (1), Montana (1), Tennessee (1), Utah (1) and Vermont (1). Laws enacted before 2025, including Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act of 2008, are not listed here.
What do these laws cover?
Biometric identifiers such as face, fingerprint and voice data, facial recognition in schools and by government, automatic license plate readers, electronic monitoring of employees, and camera enforcement on the roads. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.
Which states have the most biometric and surveillance bills?
New Jersey (31), New York (28), Congress (24), Minnesota (18) and Illinois (17). In all, 319 bills in 45 jurisdictions, the latest action on 23 October 2026.
Is this legal advice?
No. Which bills count as biometric privacy and surveillance bills, and the line on what each law requires, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Follow biometric privacy and surveillance bills in every state
The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.