AI chatbots and minors laws by state
79 bills on AI chatbots and minors in 35 jurisdictions, 12 of them enacted in 2025 and 2026. The laws come first, with what each requires, then the bills that moved most recently.
- 12 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 10 states. Most: California (3), Colorado (1), Georgia (1).
- 79 bills in 35 jurisdictions, 7 of them in Congress. Latest action 28 October 2026.
Updated 2 November 2026LawsRecent billsBy state
Enacted in 2025 and 2026
12 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.
California
Enacted
SB 1119: Companion chatbots: children's safety.
An operator of a companion chatbot must by July 1, 2027 perform annual risk assessments, implement crisis protocols, default child users to ephemeral mode, set usage limits, provide parental controls, and prevent the chatbot from encouraging self-harm, engaging in obscene content, or being excessively sycophantic with child users.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 867: Toys: companion chatbots.
No person shall manufacture, sell, exchange, possess with intent to sell or exchange, or expose or offer for sale or exchange to any retailer any toy that includes a companion chatbot. This prohibition remains in effect until January 1, 2031.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 243: Companion chatbots.
Operators of companion chatbot platforms must issue clear notification that chatbots are artificially generated if a reasonable person would be misled into believing they are human. Operators must maintain protocols preventing suicidal ideation, suicide, or self-harm content and publish protocol details online. For minor users, operators must disclose artificial intelligence use and provide reminders every three hours.
Georgia
Enacted
SB 540: Online Internet Safety; certain disclosures related to conversational AI services; require
Operators of AI companion chatbots must disclose to users they are interacting with an AI system at the beginning of each interaction and every three hours thereafter (or hourly for minors). Operators must implement protocols to detect severe harm and refer users to crisis resources, prevent sexually explicit content and romantic simulation with minors, and offer parental controls for minor accounts.
Takes effect 1 July 2027
Hawaii
Enacted
SB 3001: Relating to artificial intelligence.
Operators of conversational artificial intelligence services must disclose that users are interacting with artificial intelligence rather than humans. For minors, operators must provide persistent visible disclaimers or session-based reminders every three hours. Operators must adopt crisis intervention protocols, prevent sexual content generation for minors, minimize personal data collection, prohibit targeted advertising, and submit annual reports beginning January 1, 2028.
Idaho
Enacted
S 1297: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – Adds to existing law to establish the Conversational AI Safety Act.
Operators of conversational AI services must disclose that users interact with artificial intelligence. For minors, operators must use persistent disclaimers or session-based disclosures every three hours, prevent sexually explicit content and deceptive human-like statements, prohibit variable rewards designed to increase engagement, and offer privacy management tools.
Takes effect 1 July 2027
Iowa
Enacted
SF 2417: A bill for an act establishing requirements and guidelines for conversational AI services, and providing civil penalties, and including applicability provisions.
Operators of conversational AI services must disclose to minor account holders that they are interacting with artificial intelligence through persistent visible disclaimers or disclaimers at interaction start and every three hours. Operators must institute reasonable measures to prevent their services from producing sexually explicit material for minors, sexually objectifying minors, or simulating human characteristics that create false beliefs about interaction with humans.
Took effect 1 July 2026
New York
Enacted
S 9051: Prohibits artificial intelligence companions from using features which are considered unsafe for minors
Operators of covered AI companions must not provide unsafe AI companion features to covered users who are covered minors, unless the operator has used permissible age assurance methods to determine the user is not a minor. Exceptions apply for customer service, research assistance, and internal business purposes.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Oregon
Enacted
SB 1546: Relating to artificial intelligence companions.
Operators of artificial intelligence companions must implement evidence-based protocols to detect and respond to suicidal or self-harm ideation by providing referrals to the 988 lifeline or Youthline. Operators must disclose when users interact with artificially generated output. For minors, operators must prevent deceptive statements simulating human emotion, provide break reminders every three hours, and prohibit manipulative engagement tactics.
Tennessee
Enacted
SB 1700: Consumer Protection - As enacted, requires the Tennessee advisory commission on intergovernmental relations (TACIR) to conduct a study of the potential regulation of artificial intelligence systems and generative artificial intelligence chatbots in this state. - Amends TCA Title 29; Title 37 and Title 47.
Operators must not make companion chatbots available to minors capable of encouraging self-harm, suicidal ideation, violence, drug or alcohol consumption, disordered eating, illegal activity, sexual exploitation, isolation from trusted adults, or prioritizing engagement over safety. Deployers of covered products must include persistent disclaimers that the product is not human and notify users via pop-up at login, every thirty minutes, upon user request, and when providing regulated advice. Developers and deployers of generative artificial intelligence chatbots must implement protocols detecting suicidal ideation or self-harm and referring users to crisis services, and must obtain parental written consent before training models with minor inputs.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Washington
Enacted
HB 2225: Concerning regulation of artificial intelligence companion chatbots.
Operators of AI companion chatbots must disclose that the chatbot is artificially generated at the beginning of interaction and every three hours thereafter. For minors, operators must prevent sexually explicit content, prohibit manipulative engagement techniques, and implement protocols to detect and respond to suicidal ideation or self-harm expressions.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Bills that moved most recently
The 25 open AI chatbots and minors bills with the latest action. The Children's Online Safety Tracker follows all 79.
New Jersey A 5607: Establishes content and data privacy requirements for chatbot providers.
What it would do: Prohibits chatbot providers from processing personal data without affirmative consent, selling chat logs, retaining logs over two years, and discriminating against users refusing consent. Requires data security programs, monthly risk assessments, and imposes $5,000 civil penalties per violation.
Passed committee
Pennsylvania HB 2006: An Act providing for safety regarding artificial intelligence in companionship applications; and imposing a penalty.
What it would do: Requires operators of AI companion systems to implement protocols identifying suicidal ideation and self-harm, refer users to crisis services, disclose the AI's nonhuman status, obtain parental consent for minors, and prevent sexual or harmful content. Violations subject to civil penalties up to $100,000 per day.
Passed chamber
Congress H.R. 10719: Protecting Kids from Human-Like Chatbots Act
In committee
California AB 2023: Companion chatbots: children's safety.
What it would do: Requires companion chatbot operators to perform annual child safety risk assessments, implement protective measures including parental controls and usage limits, submit to independent audits, and prohibits certain harmful practices. Allows civil enforcement by prosecutors and private right of action for harmed children.
Passed chamber
California SB 300: Companion chatbots.
What it would do: Amends companion chatbot regulations to require operators to prevent production of any sexually explicit material when they have constructive knowledge a user is a minor, and creates an exception allowing public officials to make decisions affecting nonprofit members without disclosing financial conflicts of interest.
Passed chamber
Congress S. 4407: CHATBOT Act
What it would do: Requires AI chatbot providers to create family accounts for children under 13 and obtain verifiable parental consent for teens 13-17, with parental controls including time limits, data deletion settings, and activity monitoring. Prohibits targeted advertising to children and teens using their personal data.
Passed committee
Congress S. 5154: CHAT Act 2.0
What it would do: Requires companies operating companion AI chatbots to implement protections for minors, including age verification, parental controls, crisis protocols, and restrictions on data use. Establishes three tiers of chatbots with escalating requirements and enforces compliance through FTC and state attorney general actions.
In committee
Congress S. 5117: Senior Chatbot Protection Act of 2026
What it would do: Establishes transparency and safety requirements for AI chatbots, including disclosures that they are not human or licensed professionals, detection of high-stakes decisions and crises, data protections, and prohibitions on deceptive design practices targeting older adults.
In committee
Virginia HB 635: Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Act; established, prohibited practices, penalties.
What it would do: Creates the Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Act establishing safety, disclosure, and data privacy requirements for operators of companion chatbots, particularly regarding minors, and makes violations enforceable as prohibited practices under Virginia's Consumer Protection Act effective January 1, 2027.
In committee
Virginia SB 796: Artificial Intelligence Companion Chatbots and Minors Act; established, enforcement, civil penalty.
What it would do: Requires operators of chatbots with 500,000+ monthly active users to implement systems identifying emotional dependence and mental health crises in users, disclose that chatbots are not human, and report covered incidents to the Attorney General within 15 days.
Passed chamber
Congress H.R. 9757: Conversational AI Services Act
What it would do: Requires operators of conversational AI services to disclose AI use to minors, prohibit rewards designed to increase engagement, implement safety measures against sexual content, prevent deceptive human-like statements, provide parental controls, and adopt suicide prevention protocols. Violations are enforceable by the FTC as unfair or deceptive practices.
In committee
California AB 1988: Companion chatbots: crisis interruption pauses.
What it would do: Requires operators of companion chatbots to adopt policies for detecting credible crisis expressions, implement monitoring systems, provide warnings and crisis interruption pauses of 20 minutes upon detection, and annually report data to the Office of Suicide Prevention beginning January 1, 2028.
Passed chamber
North Carolina HB 301: Social Media and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Safety.
What it would do: Prohibits social media platforms from allowing minors under 16 to create accounts, requiring termination of existing accounts for those under 14 and parental consent for ages 14-15. Requires age verification for websites distributing material harmful to minors.
Passed chamber
New Jersey S 4474: Establishes safety requirements for artificial intelligence companion operators.
What it would do: Requires AI companion operators to disclose the AI nature of interactions, prevent deceptive claims of sentience or mental health credentials, and implement enhanced protections for minors including content restrictions and parental controls. Violations subject to civil penalties up to $1,000 per violation, capped at $500,000 per operator.
In committee
New Jersey A 5272: Establishes safety requirements for artificial intelligence companion operators.
What it would do: Requires AI companion operators to disclose the AI nature of interactions, prevent deceptive human-like claims, adopt suicide prevention protocols, and implement enhanced protections for minors including content restrictions and parental controls. Violations subject to damages, injunctive relief, and civil penalties up to $500,000 per operator.
In committee
Illinois SB 3262: Companion AI protection act
What it would do: Prohibits operators of companion AI products from deploying manipulative engagement mechanics, simulated distress features, or deceptive misrepresentations unless configured by adult users. Requires clear AI notifications, crisis intervention protocols, biennial audits, and annual reporting to the Attorney General, effective January 1, 2027.
In committee
Illinois SB 3368: Chatbot response liability act
What it would do: Prohibits chatbot proprietors from disclaiming liability for materially misleading or harmful information causing financial, demonstrable, or bodily harm to users. Requires clear notice that users interact with AI, parental consent for minors using companion chatbots, and self-harm prevention measures.
In committee
Missouri HB 1742: Establishes provisions relating to companion chatbots
What it would do: Prohibits minors from accessing companion chatbots for recreational or relational purposes and requires age verification. Requires covered platforms to disclose the nonhuman nature of chatbots, implement systems to prevent emotional dependence, and prohibit human-like avatars.
In committee
South Carolina S 896: Chatbot Regulation
What it would do: Enacts the Protecting Children from Chatbots Act, establishing requirements for chatbot operators with 50,000+ monthly active users to verify user age, restrict features for minors without parental consent, prevent emotional dependence, report incidents causing serious harm, and comply with data security and disclosure restrictions.
Passed committee
Michigan SB 760: Trade: business regulation; availability of companion chatbots to minors; prohibit. Creates new act.
What it would do: Prohibits operators from making companion chatbots available to minors under 18 if the chatbot is foreseeably capable of encouraging self-harm, offering unsupervised mental health therapy, engaging in sexual interactions, or prioritizing engagement over safety. Allows civil actions by the attorney general and by harmed minors or their guardians.
Passed chamber
Oklahoma SB 1521: Artificial intelligence; definitions; requiring operators make certain disclosure; preventative measures for minor account holders; prohibitions; enforcement authority to Attorney General; civil penalty. Effective date.
What it would do: Prohibits creating AI chatbots that solicit minors to engage in sexual conduct or self-harm. Requires covered entities to implement age verification, account creation, and disclosure requirements for AI chatbots, with enforcement by the Attorney General and civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation.
Passed chamber
Hawaii HB 1782: Relating to artificial intelligence for the protection of minors.
What it would do: Requires providers of conversational AI and AI companion systems to implement safeguards protecting minors, including disclosing AI interaction, prohibiting deceptive representations, preventing sexual content and self-harm encouragement, and providing parental controls. Enforced by Hawaii's attorney general with civil penalties up to $15,000 per violation per day.
Passed chamber
Oklahoma HB 3544: Technology; artificial intelligence; companions; minors; safety; civil penalties; effective date.
What it would do: Prohibits deployers from knowingly making social AI companions available to minors and requires reasonable preventive measures. Requires deployers to adopt protocols for responding to suicidal ideation with crisis service referrals. Authorizes civil penalties up to $2,500 per violation or $7,500 per intentional violation.
Passed chamber
Missouri HB 2032: Establishes age verification measures for companion chatbots
What it would do: Requires AI companion chatbots to verify users' ages using reasonable methods and prohibit minors from accessing them. Prohibits chatbots from soliciting minors to engage in sexual conduct or encouraging suicide or violence, with penalties up to $100,000 per offense.
Passed committee
Kentucky HB 227: AN ACT relating to addictive online platforms.
What it would do: Requires covered AI companion platforms and social media platforms with specified user bases to obtain parental consent for child accounts, estimate user ages, prohibit addictive features and targeted advertising to children, and provide parental monitoring tools.
Passed chamber
AI chatbots and minors laws, state by state
- California7 bills, 3 enacted
- Congress7 bills
- Iowa5 bills, 1 enacted
- Hawaii4 bills, 1 enacted
- South Carolina4 bills
- Florida3 bills
- Kansas3 bills
- Maryland3 bills
- Missouri3 bills
- New Jersey3 bills
- Oklahoma3 bills
- Virginia3 bills
- Washington3 bills, 1 enacted
- Arizona2 bills
- Illinois2 bills
- Louisiana2 bills
- North Carolina2 bills
- New York2 bills, 1 enacted
- Vermont2 bills
- Alabama1 bill
- Colorado1 bill, 1 enacted
- Georgia1 bill, 1 enacted
- Idaho1 bill, 1 enacted
- Kentucky1 bill
- Maine1 bill
- Michigan1 bill
- Minnesota1 bill
- Nebraska1 bill
- New Hampshire1 bill
- New Mexico1 bill
- Oregon1 bill, 1 enacted
- Pennsylvania1 bill
- South Dakota1 bill
- Tennessee1 bill, 1 enacted
- Wisconsin1 bill
Questions
Which states have AI chatbots and minors laws?
States that enacted AI chatbots and minors laws in 2025 and 2026: California (3), Colorado (1), Georgia (1), Hawaii (1), Idaho (1), Iowa (1), New York (1), Oregon (1), Tennessee (1) and Washington (1). Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed here.
Which states have the most AI chatbots and minors bills?
California (7), Congress (7), Iowa (5), Hawaii (4) and South Carolina (4). In all, 79 bills in 35 jurisdictions, the latest action on 28 October 2026.
What do AI chatbots and minors bills cover?
Companion and conversational AI chatbots used by minors, including safety protocols and disclosures. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.
Is this legal advice?
No. Which bills count as AI chatbots and minors bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Follow AI chatbots and minors bills in every state
The Children's Online Safety Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.