Children's data and design codes laws by state

78 bills on children's data and design codes in 35 jurisdictions, 13 of them enacted in 2025 and 2026. The laws come first, with what each requires, then the bills that moved most recently.

  • 13 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 10 states. Most: California (3), Louisiana (2), Arizona (1).
  • 78 bills in 35 jurisdictions, 6 of them in Congress. Latest action 1 October 2026.

Updated 2 November 2026LawsRecent billsBy state

Enacted in 2025 and 2026

13 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.

Arizona

  • Enacted

    HB 2195: digital advertising; content; children; penalty

    An application platform must not display inappropriate and mature advertisements on a child-directed application. Advertisements placed on child-directed applications must be suitable for individuals twelve years of age or younger. Application platforms must implement monitoring systems to ensure compliance.

California

  • Enacted

    AB 1159: Student personal information.

    Operators of internet websites, online services, online applications, or mobile applications designed or marketed for K-12, preschool, prekindergarten, or higher education purposes must not use covered information including persistent unique identifiers to train generative AI systems or develop AI systems. Operators must implement reasonable security, delete information upon request, and establish data retention policies.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

  • Enacted

    AB 2246: Online service, product, or feature: access by children.

    A business that provides an online service, product, or feature likely to be accessed by children must estimate child users' ages, configure high-privacy default settings, provide clear privacy information, offer monitoring signals, and supply privacy tools. The business must not profile children by default, use their personal information beyond collection purposes, collect unnecessary information, use dark patterns, or collect precise geolocation by default.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

  • Enacted

    AB 1043: Age verification signals: software applications and online services.

    Operating system providers must provide an accessible interface at account setup requiring account holders to indicate a user's birth date or age, and must send developers a digital signal via real-time API identifying the user's age bracket when requested. Developers must request signals when applications are downloaded and launched, and must treat signals as the primary age indicator.

Connecticut

  • Enacted

    SB 1295: An act concerning broadband internet, gaming, social media, online services and consumer contracts.

    Qualified broadband internet access service providers must offer affordable broadband service costing no more than forty dollars monthly to eligible households by October 1, 2026, meeting minimum speed requirements of 100 Mbps downstream and 5-20 Mbps upstream depending on date. Providers must make commercially reasonable efforts to publicize availability and submit annual reports to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

    Took effect 1 July 2026

Louisiana

  • Enacted

    HB 427: CONTRACTS: Provides relative to the duty of care for online platforms that contract with minors

  • Enacted

    HB 37: CONTRACTS: Establishes a duty of care for online platforms who contract with minors

    Every owner or operator of a covered platform who contracts with a minor must prohibit adults from connecting to minors unless the minor initiates contact, prohibit adults from sending private messages to minors unless connected, prohibit disclosing a minor's geolocation to non-legal representatives, and prohibit adults from viewing a minor's profile unless connected. Covered platforms must notify legal representatives within twenty-four hours of microtransactions, exposure to sexually explicit material, or adult-minor connections.

    Took effect 1 June 2026

Nebraska

  • Enacted

    LB 504: Adopt the Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act

    Covered online services must provide covered minors with accessible tools to limit communications, control design features, manage personalized recommendations, restrict in-game purchases, and control geolocation tracking. They must collect only minimum necessary personal data, prohibit targeted advertising to covered minors, restrict notifications during specified hours, and provide parents with monitoring and control tools.

New Jersey

  • Enacted

    A 4015: "New Jersey Kids Code Act"; adopts New Jersey Age-Appropriate Design Code and requires certain online service providers to implement certain measures concerning minors' use of online service.*

    Covered online service providers must implement default privacy settings providing the highest protection for minors, prohibit reducing privacy settings, refrain from targeted advertising to minors, avoid dark patterns, and issue annual reports detailing design features, data practices, and usage metrics prepared by independent third-party auditors.

Oregon

  • Enacted

    HB 2008: Relating to consumer protection.

    Amends Oregon's consumer protection law to modify the definition of personal data subject to sale restrictions, specifying that location data accurate within 1,750 feet is covered, while excluding communication content and utility metering infrastructure data.

South Carolina

  • Enacted

    H 3431: South Carolina Social Media Regulation Act

    Covered online services must exercise reasonable care to prevent harm to minors from compulsive usage, psychological harm, emotional distress, privacy violations, identity theft, discrimination, and financial or physical injury. Services must provide users tools to disable design features, limit time spent, control purchases, restrict messaging, and opt out of personalized recommendations. Services must collect only minimum necessary personal data, prohibit targeted advertising to minors, and establish parental monitoring tools.

Vermont

  • Enacted

    S 69: An act relating to an age-appropriate design code

    Covered businesses must configure default privacy settings for covered minors to the highest level of privacy, prohibit collection of unnecessary personal data, provide transparency about algorithmic recommendation systems and data practices, and not send push notifications between midnight and 6 a.m. Covered businesses must honor account deletion requests within 15 days.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

Virginia

  • Enacted

    SB 854: Consumer Data Protection Act; social media platforms, responsibilities and prohibitions to minors.

    Controllers and processors operating social media platforms must use commercially reasonable methods to determine if a user is a minor and limit minors' daily use to one hour per service or application, allowing parents to adjust limits with verifiable consent. Age-determination information cannot be used for other purposes.

    Took effect 1 January 2026

Bills that moved most recently

The 25 open children's data and design codes bills with the latest action. The Children's Online Safety Tracker follows all 78.

  • New Jersey S 4661: Prohibits sale of minor's personal data; requires controllers and processors to provide mechanism for requesting deletion of certain personal data.

    What it would do: Prohibits controllers and processors from selling personal data of consumers known to be under 18 years old. Requires controllers and processors to provide a mechanism for minors or their parents to request deletion of the minor's personal data.

    In committee

  • Illinois SB 3241: Age-appropriate design code

    What it would do: Requires covered entities processing children's data to act in children's best interests, complete data protection impact assessments for online services reasonably likely accessed by children, and comply with specified privacy protections. Authorizes Attorney General enforcement with civil penalties up to $7,500 per affected child for intentional violations.

    In committee

  • Congress S. 1748: Kids Online Safety Act

    What it would do: Requires covered online platforms to exercise reasonable care in design features to prevent harms to minors including eating disorders, substance abuse, and sexual exploitation. Mandates safeguards, parental tools, transparency reporting, and prohibits opaque algorithms without user opt-out options.

    Passed committee

  • Congress S. 4199: Youth AI Privacy Act

    What it would do: Requires AI chatbot deployers to disclose to minors that they are not interacting with humans, prohibits personalization based on user data, bans compulsive-use features, restricts advertising, and prohibits processing minor user data for profiling or algorithm training, with FTC enforcement and private right of action for parents.

    Passed committee

  • Virginia SB 232: Consumer Data Protection Act; prohibitions and duties relating to minors.

    What it would do: Amends Virginia's Consumer Data Protection Act to add protections for minors, including prohibiting online service agreements with minors without verified parental consent, limiting social media use to one hour daily for users under 16, and requiring controllers to disclose targeted advertising and exercise reasonable care to prevent harm to minors.

    Passed committee

  • New Jersey S 3413: "New Jersey Kids Code Act"; adopts New Jersey Age-Appropriate Design Code and requires certain online service providers to implement certain measures concerning minors' use of online service.*

    What it would do: Requires covered online service providers with annual revenue exceeding $25,000,000 or processing personal data of 25,000+ consumers to implement age-appropriate privacy and safety protections for minors, including default high-privacy settings, restrictions on data use and algorithmic recommendations, notification limits, and mechanisms for account deletion.

    Passed committee

  • Illinois SB 3735: Educ-tech rts/biometric info

    What it would do: Establishes student and parent rights to opt out of school-issued electronic devices, automated grading, and predictive analytics with comparable analog alternatives. Prohibits school districts from purchasing or using biometric systems on students and requires destruction of existing biometric information within 30 days. Restricts operators from selling student data or training artificial intelligence on student information for non-school purposes.

    In committee

  • California AB 2426: Online platforms: educational children's content.

    What it would do: Requires advertising-supported digital content platforms with annual gross revenues exceeding $100,000,000 to establish and maintain a walled garden section containing at least four hours of educational children's content free from targeted advertising and accessible without account creation.

    Passed committee

  • Colorado HB 1148: Protections for Youth on Social Media

    What it would do: Requires covered businesses offering online gaming services to minors to implement privacy protections including highest-level default privacy settings, account deletion tools, restrictions on data collection and use, and prohibits compulsive use design practices. Imposes a 5% fee on add-on transactions by minors, with revenue directed to the state public school fund.

    Introduced

  • Illinois HB 3041: Data privacy and protection

    What it would do: Creates the Illinois Data Privacy and Protection Act, requiring covered entities to limit data collection to what is reasonably necessary, establish privacy policies, obtain affirmative express consent for sensitive data, and comply with individual rights including access, deletion, and correction of personal data.

    In committee

  • Minnesota HF 4511: Minnesota Age-Appropriate Design Code Act created, obligations placed on certain businesses regarding children's consumer information, and attorney general enforcement provided.

    What it would do: Creates the Minnesota Age-Appropriate Design Code Act requiring businesses meeting revenue or data thresholds to complete data protection impact assessments for online products accessed by children, configure high-privacy defaults, and prohibit harmful data practices. Authorizes attorney general enforcement with civil penalties up to $7,500 per affected child for intentional violations.

    In committee

  • New Mexico HB 214: Consumer information and data protection act

    What it would do: Creates the Consumer Information and Data Protection Act establishing data privacy rights for New Mexico residents, including rights to access, correct, delete, and port personal data, and restricts collection and sale of personal data, particularly for minors and sensitive health information.

    Introduced

  • New Jersey S 4016: Concerns social media privacy and data management for children and establishes New Jersey Children's Data Protection Commission.

    What it would do: Requires social media platforms to complete data protection impact assessments before offering new services likely accessed by children under 18, prohibits harmful data practices targeting children, and establishes a nine-member New Jersey Children's Data Protection Commission to recommend privacy best practices.

    In committee

  • Congress S. 836: Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act

    What it would do: Amends the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act to expand protections for children and teens by restricting individual-specific advertising, requiring verifiable consent from parents or teens, expanding the definition of personal information to include persistent identifiers and biometric data, and requiring operators to delete personal information upon request.

    Passed chamber

  • Washington SB 5708: Protecting Washington children online.

    What it would do: Requires businesses providing online services likely accessed by minors to estimate user age, restrict data collection from children under 13, use high-privacy default settings, and prohibit dark patterns and harmful profiling. Restricts addictive feeds to non-minors and limits notifications to minors during school hours without parental consent.

    Floor vote

  • Maryland HB 1638: Consumer Protection - Covered Platforms - Protection of Minors (Kids Online Protection and Antigrooming Act)

    What it would do: Requires owners or operators of covered platforms to establish default privacy and safety settings for minors under 17, including restricting adult connections, prohibiting unsolicited messaging, limiting geolocation sharing, and allowing parents to manage accounts and receive notifications. Authorizes the Attorney General to enforce violations with civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation after providing 45 days to cure.

    In committee

  • Kentucky HB 633: AN ACT relating to data privacy.

    What it would do: Amends Kentucky data privacy law to add protections for minors on online services, including default high privacy settings, deletion tools, opt-out of algorithmic feeds, parental controls, blocking features, and restrictions on profiling, targeted advertising, dark patterns, and push notifications during school and nighttime hours.

    In committee

  • South Dakota HB 1309: restrict the processing of online personal data of individuals sixteen years of age or younger.

    What it would do: Prohibits operators of online applications and websites from processing personal data of users sixteen years or younger unless permitted under federal law, parental consent is obtained, or processing is strictly necessary for specified operational purposes.

    In committee

  • Washington HB 1834: Protecting Washington children online.

    What it would do: Prohibits operators of addictive internet-based services from providing addictive feeds to minors without age verification starting July 1, 2027, and restricts push notifications to minors during certain hours without parental consent. Requires operators to provide users mechanisms to limit feed access, hide engagement metrics, and set accounts to private.

    Passed committee

  • Georgia SB 495: "Age-Appropriate Design Code Act"; enact

    What it would do: Restricts covered entities from engaging in high-risk data practices targeting minors, including collecting unnecessary personal data, using algorithmic feeds without consent, and deploying compulsive design features. Requires risk assessments, default privacy settings, deletion requests, and transparency disclosures.

    In committee

  • Mississippi SB 2388: Kids Online Protection and Anti-Grooming Act; enact.

    What it would do: Requires owners and operators of covered platforms to owe minors a duty of care including prohibiting adults from initiating contact with minors and notifying legal representatives within 24 hours of microtransactions, sexually explicit material exposure, or adult-minor connections, with violations subject to damages and attorney's fees.

    In committee

  • Washington SB 6111: Protecting children online.

    What it would do: Requires digital service providers offering social networking features to verify user age, obtain parental consent for minors 16 and under, limit data collection, prohibit precise geolocation tracking and targeted unlawful advertising to minors, and implement strategies to prevent minor exposure to harmful content including self-harm, exploitation, and violence.

    In committee

  • Hawaii HB 2040: Relating to protection of minors.

    What it would do: Prohibits social media platforms from providing algorithmically-curated feeds to minors without parental consent or age verification, and restricts collection and sale of personal data from minors unless necessary for service provision or permitted by federal law.

    In committee

  • New Jersey A 1358: Concerns social media privacy and data management for children and establishes New Jersey Children's Data Protection Commission.

    What it would do: Requires social media platforms to complete Data Protection Impact Assessments before offering new services likely accessed by children, prohibits certain data practices harmful to children, and establishes a nine-member New Jersey Children's Data Protection Commission to recommend best practices.

    In committee

  • New York A 6549: Establishes the "stop online predators act"

    What it would do: Requires online platforms used by minors under 18 to conduct age verification, implement default privacy protections preventing non-connected users from contacting, viewing profiles, tagging, or transacting with minors, and obtain parental approval for connections and financial transactions for users under 13.

    In committee

Questions

Which states have children's data and design codes laws?

States that enacted children's data and design codes laws in 2025 and 2026: California (3), Louisiana (2), Arizona (1), Connecticut (1), Nebraska (1), New Jersey (1), Oregon (1), South Carolina (1), Vermont (1) and Virginia (1). Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed here.

Which states have the most children's data and design codes bills?

Virginia (8), New Jersey (6), Congress (6), California (5) and New York (4). In all, 78 bills in 35 jurisdictions, the latest action on 1 October 2026.

What do children's data and design codes bills cover?

Age-appropriate design codes and protections for minors' personal data in online services. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.

Is this legal advice?

No. Which bills count as children's data and design codes bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.

Follow children's data and design codes bills in every state

The Children's Online Safety Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.