Children's and student data laws by state

239 bills on children's and student data in 47 jurisdictions, 33 of them enacted in 2025 and 2026. The laws come first, with what each requires, then the bills that moved most recently.

  • 33 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 21 states. Most: California (4), Utah (3), Virginia (3).
  • 239 bills in 47 jurisdictions, 21 of them in Congress. Latest action 16 October 2026.

Updated 2 November 2026LawsRecent billsBy state

Enacted in 2025 and 2026

33 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.

Arkansas

  • Enacted

    HB 1717: To create the arkansas children and teens' online privacy protection act.

    This amendment modifies House Bill 1717 by adjusting technical provisions related to operators' handling of children's and teens' personal information online, including revisions to data retention, deletion request procedures, and security protections. The specific operative obligations cannot be fully determined from this amendment text alone without the underlying bill.

California

  • Enacted

    SB 930: Student Test Taker Privacy Protection Act: end-to-end encryption.

    A business providing proctoring services to a school district, county office of education, or charter school for classroom- or course-based exams must use end-to-end encryption to provide those services. The business must collect, use, retain, and disclose only personal information strictly necessary to provide proctoring services.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

  • Enacted

    AB 1159: Student personal information.

    Operators of internet websites, online services, online applications, or mobile applications designed or marketed for K-12, preschool, prekindergarten, or higher education purposes must not use covered information including persistent unique identifiers to train generative AI systems or develop AI systems. Operators must implement reasonable security, delete information upon request, and establish data retention policies.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

  • Enacted

    AB 1043: Age verification signals: software applications and online services.

    Operating system providers must provide an accessible interface at account setup requiring account holders to indicate a user's birth date or age, and must send developers a digital signal via real-time API identifying the user's age bracket when requested. Developers must request signals when applications are downloaded and launched, and must treat signals as the primary age indicator.

  • Enacted

    SB 391: Community colleges: Chancellor of the California Community Colleges: data request fee policy.

    The Chancellor of the California Community Colleges may implement a data request fee policy for researchers applying for access to individually identifiable data or student data. If implemented, the policy must be reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors, revised periodically, made publicly available on the chancellor's website, and comply with federal and state privacy laws. Fees cannot be imposed on state agencies (except UC, CSU, or State Department of Education), undergraduate or graduate students seeking data for individual studies, or community college faculty seeking data for individual research.

Colorado

  • Enacted

    SB 25-143: Extend Prohibition on School Facial Recognition

    Schools and school contractors must not process biometric identifiers without obtaining opt-in consent on a stand-alone form that specifies collection, use, and retention. Schools must retain biometric identifiers no longer than eighteen months. Schools using facial recognition for safety must disable the system immediately after identifying the individual and develop policies designating authorized personnel.

Connecticut

  • Enacted

    SB 5: An act concerning online safety.

    Subscription-based providers must disclose key terms and conditions in writing before entering or renewing subscriptions. Frontier developers must prohibit retaliation against employees reporting catastrophic risks and establish anonymous reporting processes. Large frontier developers must investigate reports and provide monthly updates. Operators of AI companions must detect suicidal ideation and provide mental health resources, and must not provide companions to minors capable of encouraging self-harm.

    Took effect 1 October 2026

  • Enacted

    SB 1295: An act concerning broadband internet, gaming, social media, online services and consumer contracts.

    Qualified broadband internet access service providers must offer affordable broadband service costing no more than forty dollars monthly to eligible households by October 1, 2026, meeting minimum speed requirements of 100 Mbps downstream and 5-20 Mbps upstream depending on date. Providers must make commercially reasonable efforts to publicize availability and submit annual reports to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

    Took effect 1 July 2026

Georgia

  • Enacted

    SB 540: Online Internet Safety; certain disclosures related to conversational AI services; require

    Operators of AI companion chatbots must disclose to users they are interacting with an AI system at the beginning of each interaction and every three hours thereafter (or hourly for minors). Operators must implement protocols to detect severe harm and refer users to crisis resources, prevent sexually explicit content and romantic simulation with minors, and offer parental controls for minor accounts.

    Takes effect 1 July 2027

Hawaii

  • Enacted

    SB 3001: Relating to artificial intelligence.

    Operators of conversational artificial intelligence services must disclose that users are interacting with artificial intelligence rather than humans. For minors, operators must provide persistent visible disclaimers or session-based reminders every three hours. Operators must adopt crisis intervention protocols, prevent sexual content generation for minors, minimize personal data collection, prohibit targeted advertising, and submit annual reports beginning January 1, 2028.

Illinois

  • Enacted

    HB 5511: Digital age assurance

    Covered manufacturers must provide an accessible interface by January 1, 2028 requiring account holders to indicate a user's birth date or age, and transmit age bracket data signals to covered operators upon user consent. Covered operators must request age bracket signals, treat them as authoritative for users under 18, and implement default privacy protections for covered minors including restricted visibility, disabled direct messaging with adults, and prohibited addictive feeds without verifiable parental consent.

    Takes effect 1 January 2028

Minnesota

  • Enacted

    HF 4138: Social media platform requirements established relating to accounts for minors, and enforcement mechanisms established for regulations on child social media accounts.

    Covered social media platforms must obtain verifiable parental consent before creating or maintaining accounts for children age 15 or younger. Platforms must set child accounts to maximum privacy by default, prohibit addictive interface features and targeted paid advertising on child accounts, estimate user ages within specified timeframes and confidence thresholds, and terminate child accounts upon request within seven days.

Montana

  • Enacted

    HB 599: Revise student data collection laws

    Government entities must not interfere with parental rights to direct child upbringing, education, and health care unless furthering a compelling governmental interest by the least restrictive means. Parents must be notified of physical and mental health surveys and screenings. Parents may opt children out of personal analysis, evaluation, survey, or data collection not requiring personally identifiable information, and opt in to those requiring such information.

  • Enacted

    HB 631: Revise student online protection laws related to postsecondary opportunities

    Amends Montana student data privacy law to exclude courses providing postsecondary credit and work-based learning courses from the definition of K-12 school purposes, removing data privacy restrictions for those educational activities.

Nebraska

  • Enacted

    LB 504: Adopt the Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act

    Covered online services must provide covered minors with accessible tools to limit communications, control design features, manage personalized recommendations, restrict in-game purchases, and control geolocation tracking. They must collect only minimum necessary personal data, prohibit targeted advertising to covered minors, restrict notifications during specified hours, and provide parents with monitoring and control tools.

Nevada

  • Enacted

    SB 445: Revises provisions relating to the privacy of data concerning pupils. (BDR 34-854)

New Hampshire

  • Enacted

    HB 1727: relative to student data sharing for the Summer EBT program.

    The department of education shall provide the department of health and human services with the name, date of birth, and household address of students eligible for free or reduced-price meals for Summer EBT enrollment. School districts and school administrative units shall provide parents or guardians with a distinct notice and opt-out form within 15 days of the free or reduced-price meals decision. Students are automatically enrolled in Summer EBT unless parents or guardians return the opt-out form within 15 days.

  • Enacted

    HB 1460: prohibiting the sale of a child's personal data.

    Persons subject to RSA 507-H:6, I must not sell a child's personal data. The act adds this prohibition to existing expectations of privacy requirements effective January 1, 2027.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

New Jersey

  • Enacted

    A 4015: "New Jersey Kids Code Act"; adopts New Jersey Age-Appropriate Design Code and requires certain online service providers to implement certain measures concerning minors' use of online service.*

    Covered online service providers must implement default privacy settings providing the highest protection for minors, prohibit reducing privacy settings, refrain from targeted advertising to minors, avoid dark patterns, and issue annual reports detailing design features, data practices, and usage metrics prepared by independent third-party auditors.

North Carolina

  • Enacted

    SB 133: Ncccs lms/nclds.

    The State Board of Community Colleges must conduct a competitive solicitation for a learning management system for all community colleges by December 31, 2025, and complete transition to the new system by December 31, 2027. Public school units, community colleges, constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina, and State agencies must comply with data requirements and transfer student and workforce data to the North Carolina Longitudinal Data System according to the Center's implementation schedule and data security plan.

North Dakota

  • Enacted

    HB 1357: AN ACT to amend and reenact subsection 1 of section 15.1-06-06, and sections 15.1-07-25.3 and 15.1-07-33 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to protection of student data and data sharing agreements; and to provide an effective date.

    Each school district board must adopt a policy protecting student data. The policy must require permission from the board before sharing student data with non-employees or other entities, except parents or as required by law. School districts may share data with state entities using a student information system or state longitudinal dashboard if a data sharing agreement exists. The superintendent must compile lists of individuals and entities receiving student data and school personnel with data access.

Oklahoma

  • Enacted

    SB 1734: Schools; creating the Oklahoma Responsible Technology in Schools Act; requiring development of guidance for use of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. Effective date. Emergency.

    School district boards of education must adopt policies governing artificial intelligence and emerging technologies use by the beginning of the 2027-2028 school year. All classroom AI tools must operate with educator direction and human-in-the-loop oversight. School districts must provide parents annual written disclosure identifying AI tools in use, vendors, student data collected, and educational purposes. Parents may opt students out of student-facing AI tools without academic penalty.

    Took effect 1 July 2026

Oregon

  • Enacted

    HB 2508: Relating to student data; and declaring an emergency.

  • Enacted

    HB 2008: Relating to consumer protection.

    Amends Oregon's consumer protection law to modify the definition of personal data subject to sale restrictions, specifying that location data accurate within 1,750 feet is covered, while excluding communication content and utility metering infrastructure data.

South Carolina

  • Enacted

    H 4591: Stop Harm from Addictive Social Media

    Covered social media platforms must estimate account holder age within fourteen days of first trigger date, treat those under sixteen as children unless eighty percent confident they are over fifteen, obtain verifiable parental consent before creating or maintaining child accounts, set child accounts to maximum privacy by default, prohibit addictive interface features and profile-based paid advertising for children, and terminate child accounts lacking parental consent.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

  • Enacted

    H 3431: South Carolina Social Media Regulation Act

    Covered online services must exercise reasonable care to prevent harm to minors from compulsive usage, psychological harm, emotional distress, privacy violations, identity theft, discrimination, and financial or physical injury. Services must provide users tools to disable design features, limit time spent, control purchases, restrict messaging, and opt out of personalized recommendations. Services must collect only minimum necessary personal data, prohibit targeted advertising to minors, and establish parental monitoring tools.

Utah

  • Enacted

    SB 296: Student Consent Amendments

    Education entities and institutions of higher education must disclose student educational data only with informed consent, beginning July 1, 2027, through a secure digital mechanism as the primary method. They must prohibit bundling unrelated terms with consent requests and cannot deny, delay, or restrict a student's ability to grant compliant informed consent. Parents must provide consent for students under 18.

    Took effect 1 July 2026

  • Enacted

    HB 55: Privacy Compliance for Education Technology Vendors

    Education entities or government agencies contracting with third-party contractors must include specified privacy provisions in contracts, notify contractors of unauthorized student data use within 30 days, and terminate contracts if violations are not remedied within 30 days. Third-party contractors must use student data only for contracted purposes.

    Took effect 1 July 2026

  • Enacted

    SB 142: App Store Accountability Act

    App store providers must verify user age category, obtain verifiable parental consent from parents of minors before allowing downloads or purchases, notify users and parents of significant changes, share age category data and consent status with developers, and protect age verification data using encryption. Developers must verify age category and parental consent through app stores and may not enforce contracts against minors without verified parental consent.

    Took effect 7 May 2025

Vermont

  • Enacted

    S 69: An act relating to an age-appropriate design code

    Covered businesses must configure default privacy settings for covered minors to the highest level of privacy, prohibit collection of unnecessary personal data, provide transparency about algorithmic recommendation systems and data practices, and not send push notifications between midnight and 6 a.m. Covered businesses must honor account deletion requests within 15 days.

    Takes effect 1 January 2027

Virginia

  • Enacted

    HB 971: College student-athletes; biometric data, protections and limitations.

    Institutions must not disclose enrolled student-athletes' biometric data to outside individuals or entities without prior written consent. No individual or entity may make possession, use, ownership of, or rights to student-athlete biometric data a condition of any contract for name, image, or likeness rights without separate prior written consent.

    Took effect 1 July 2026

  • Enacted

    SB 854: Consumer Data Protection Act; social media platforms, responsibilities and prohibitions to minors.

    Controllers and processors operating social media platforms must use commercially reasonable methods to determine if a user is a minor and limit minors' daily use to one hour per service or application, allowing parents to adjust limits with verifiable consent. Age-determination information cannot be used for other purposes.

    Took effect 1 January 2026

  • Enacted

    SB 1486: Public schools; protection of student records and personal information, policies and procedures.

    School service providers and school technology providers must collect student personal information only with consent or for authorized contract purposes, maintain comprehensive information security programs, provide access to and correction of student data, and prohibit targeted advertising, personal profiling for non-educational purposes, and sale of student information. They must not use school-issued devices for location tracking, audio/visual monitoring, or interaction monitoring except for educational, technical support, or exam-proctoring purposes with advance notice.

Bills that moved most recently

The 25 open children's and student data bills with the latest action. The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker follows all 239.

  • Virginia HB 1534: School service providers; deletion of student and family personal information.

    What it would do: Requires school service providers to delete all student and family personal information within six months of contract termination with a school or within six months of a student's high school graduation, unless otherwise required by state or federal law.

    Introduced

  • New Jersey S 4661: Prohibits sale of minor's personal data; requires controllers and processors to provide mechanism for requesting deletion of certain personal data.

    What it would do: Prohibits controllers and processors from selling personal data of consumers known to be under 18 years old. Requires controllers and processors to provide a mechanism for minors or their parents to request deletion of the minor's personal data.

    In committee

  • Congress H.R. 4986: Parents Opt-in Protection Act

    What it would do: Amends the General Education Provisions Act to require prior written consent before students submit to surveys, analyses, or evaluations revealing personal information about the student or their family, with consent required from parents for unemancipated minors.

    Passed committee

  • Congress S. 5408: Student Voter Data Protection Act

    In committee

  • Congress H.R. 10449: Student Voter Data Protection Act

    In committee

  • Congress H.R. 10337: 16 & Up Social Media Act

    What it would do: Prohibits covered social media platforms from allowing individuals under 16 to create or maintain accounts, requiring termination of existing accounts within 180 days and deletion of personal data, with a 90-day window for users to download their data and an appeal process to challenge age determinations.

    In committee

  • California AB 2023: Companion chatbots: children's safety.

    What it would do: Requires companion chatbot operators to perform annual child safety risk assessments, implement protective measures including parental controls and usage limits, submit to independent audits, and prohibits certain harmful practices. Allows civil enforcement by prosecutors and private right of action for harmed children.

    Passed chamber

  • Illinois SB 3241: Age-appropriate design code

    What it would do: Requires covered entities processing children's data to act in children's best interests, complete data protection impact assessments for online services reasonably likely accessed by children, and comply with specified privacy protections. Authorizes Attorney General enforcement with civil penalties up to $7,500 per affected child for intentional violations.

    In committee

  • Congress S. 1748: Kids Online Safety Act

    What it would do: Requires covered online platforms to exercise reasonable care in design features to prevent harms to minors including eating disorders, substance abuse, and sexual exploitation. Mandates safeguards, parental tools, transparency reporting, and prohibits opaque algorithms without user opt-out options.

    Passed committee

  • Congress S. 4199: Youth AI Privacy Act

    What it would do: Requires AI chatbot deployers to disclose to minors that they are not interacting with humans, prohibits personalization based on user data, bans compulsive-use features, restricts advertising, and prohibits processing minor user data for profiling or algorithm training, with FTC enforcement and private right of action for parents.

    Passed committee

  • Congress S. 2511: College Transparency Act

    What it would do: Requires the Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics to develop a secure postsecondary student data system within 4 years to track enrollment, completion, costs, and post-college outcomes, with data sharing agreements with federal agencies and public reporting of aggregate information while prohibiting sale of data and use for federal rankings.

    Passed committee

  • Congress S. 5090: Digital Age Assurance Act of 2026

    What it would do: Requires operating system providers to collect user age information and provide age bracket signals to developers, application stores, browser providers, and covered internet websites. Prohibits targeted advertising to children and sale of children's personal data to data brokers.

    In committee

  • Virginia HB 757: App Store Accountability Act; civil penalties, civil action.

    What it would do: Creates the App Store Accountability Act requiring app store providers and developers to obtain verifiable parental consent before minors download apps, assign age ratings, provide content descriptions, and protect age verification data, with civil penalties up to $7,500 per violation and private rights of action for minors and parents.

    In committee

  • Virginia SB 232: Consumer Data Protection Act; prohibitions and duties relating to minors.

    What it would do: Amends Virginia's Consumer Data Protection Act to add protections for minors, including prohibiting online service agreements with minors without verified parental consent, limiting social media use to one hour daily for users under 16, and requiring controllers to disclose targeted advertising and exercise reasonable care to prevent harm to minors.

    Passed committee

  • Virginia SB 237: App Store Accountability Act; civil penalties, civil action.

    What it would do: Requires app store providers and developers to verify account holders' age categories, obtain verifiable parental consent from parents before minors download apps or make purchases, and disclose age ratings and data collection practices. Establishes civil penalties up to $7,500 per violation and private rights of action for minors and parents.

    In committee

  • Congress H.R. 9706: Facial Recognition to Protect Children Act

    What it would do: Requires wagering and prediction market platform operators to use facial recognition technology to verify users are over 18 years old before allowing access or accepting wagers. Limits data collection to what is necessary and requires deletion of unnecessary biometric data.

    In committee

  • Massachusetts S 3175: An Act protecting children from addictive social media feeds

    What it would do: Requires social media platforms to disable addictive feeds, push notifications, autoplay, and infinite scroll by default for minors, restrict minor account visibility to connected accounts only, and report quarterly de-identified data on minor usage to the attorney general.

    Passed chamber

  • Congress H.R. 7757: KIDS Act

    What it would do: Establishes requirements for online platforms to protect minors from obscene material, harmful content, and exploitative practices through age verification, safety safeguards, parental controls, and restrictions on messaging features and profiling.

    Passed chamber

  • Massachusetts S 3164: An Act protecting children from addictive social media feeds

    What it would do: Requires social media platforms to disable addictive feeds, push notifications, autoplay, and infinite scroll by default for minors and users who opt out of age verification, and restricts minors' account visibility, geolocation sharing, and messaging to connected accounts only.

    Floor vote

  • New Jersey S 3413: "New Jersey Kids Code Act"; adopts New Jersey Age-Appropriate Design Code and requires certain online service providers to implement certain measures concerning minors' use of online service.*

    What it would do: Requires covered online service providers with annual revenue exceeding $25,000,000 or processing personal data of 25,000+ consumers to implement age-appropriate privacy and safety protections for minors, including default high-privacy settings, restrictions on data use and algorithmic recommendations, notification limits, and mechanisms for account deletion.

    Passed committee

  • Congress S. 4855: SAFE KIDS Act

    What it would do: Requires AI chatbot providers to implement child safety measures including risk assessments, parental controls, crisis protocols, and annual independent audits. Prohibits child-targeted advertising and sale or sharing of children's personal information without parental consent.

    In committee

  • Ohio SB 175: Establish age verification, parental consent for apps, developers

    What it would do: Requires operating system providers and covered application stores to collect user age at account setup and provide age bracket data signals to application developers. Establishes enforcement by the Ohio Attorney General with civil penalties up to $7,500 per affected child for purposeful violations.

    In committee

  • Arizona HB 2991: social media; online content; minors

    What it would do: Establishes a grant fund for nonprofits providing online safety education and mental health services to minors, and requires social media platforms and app stores to obtain parental consent for children under 16, provide age signals, and implement safety features like time limits and message restrictions.

    Passed chamber

  • Pennsylvania SB 378: An Act amending Title 24 (Education) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in preliminary provisions, providing for student data privacy and protection; conferring powers and imposing duties on the Department of Education; and imposing penalties.

    What it would do: Establishes student data privacy protections for Pennsylvania public schools by requiring written authorization before disclosing student data, prohibiting biometric collection and targeted marketing, mandating annual privacy notices, creating a chief data privacy officer position, and imposing civil and administrative penalties for violations.

    Passed committee

  • Congress H.R. 9134: Protecting Student Privacy Act

    In committee

Questions

Which states have children's and student data laws?

States that enacted children's and student data laws in 2025 and 2026: California (4), Utah (3), Virginia (3), Connecticut (2), Montana (2), New Hampshire (2), Oregon (2), South Carolina (2), Arkansas (1), Colorado (1), Georgia (1), Hawaii (1), Illinois (1), Minnesota (1), Nebraska (1), Nevada (1), New Jersey (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1) and Vermont (1). Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed here.

Which states have the most children's and student data bills?

Congress (21), Virginia (18), Montana (13), New Jersey (13) and Massachusetts (11). In all, 239 bills in 47 jurisdictions, the latest action on 16 October 2026.

What do children's and student data bills cover?

Personal data of children, teens and students, including student records and online services used by minors. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.

Is this legal advice?

No. Which bills count as children's and student data bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.

Follow children's and student data bills in every state

The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.