Data brokers and people-search laws by state
92 bills on data brokers and people-search in 38 jurisdictions, 18 of them enacted in 2025 and 2026. The laws come first, with what each requires, then the bills that moved most recently.
- 18 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 13 states. Most: Texas (3), California (2), Rhode Island (2).
- 92 bills in 38 jurisdictions, 5 of them in Congress. Latest action 15 October 2026.
Updated 2 November 2026LawsRecent billsBy state
Enacted in 2025 and 2026
18 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.
California
Enacted
AB 883: Data brokers: accessible deletion mechanism: deletion of personal information of elected officials and judges.
Data brokers must access the accessible deletion mechanism at least once every 30 days, process all deletion requests within 30 days, and delete all personal information of consumers making requests. The Secretary of State, local filing officers, and Judicial Council must notify elected officials and judges they may request deletion of their personal information.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 361: Data brokers: data collection and deletion.
Data brokers must register annually with the California Privacy Protection Agency and provide detailed information about personal data collected, including names, dates of birth, government IDs, biometric data, and whether data was shared with foreign actors, the federal government, law enforcement, or GenAI developers. Data brokers must access the accessible deletion mechanism at least every 45 days and process deletion requests within 45 days.
Congress
Enacted
H.R. 2808: Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act
Consumer reporting agencies may not furnish a consumer report based on a prescreening request connected to a residential mortgage loan unless the recipient is a firm offer of credit or insurance and either has consumer authorization, originated or services the consumer's current mortgage, or is an insured depository institution or credit union holding the consumer's current account.
Delaware
Enacted
SB 32: An act to amend title 11 of the delaware code relating to privacy for correctional officers, and probation and parole officers.
Amends Senate Bill No. 32 to require intentional communication for prohibited conduct, limit restrictions to publicly posted or displayed personal information, remove prohibitions on transferring correctional officers' personal information, and narrow the private right of action to publicly posted or displayed information.
Georgia
Enacted
HB 199: Courts; protection of personally identifiable information of judges and their spouses; modify provisions
State or local government entities must restrict from public disclosure personally identifiable information of protected persons (current or former judges and justices of the United States, this state, or any county or municipality, and their spouses) upon written notice from the Administrative Office of the Courts or upon written request by the protected person, within 30 days of receipt.
Kentucky
Enacted
HB 662: AN ACT relating to personally identifiable information.
Government agencies must not disclose personally identifiable information of covered persons (judicial officers and their immediate family members) if the covered person makes a written request. Upon receipt of such request, agencies must remove the information from publicly available content within seventy-two hours and must not subsequently post or release it unless the covered person voluntarily publishes it.
New Jersey
Enacted
A 5328: Regulates data brokers, data collectors, and collection and dissemination of certain sensitive information.
Controllers of commercial Internet websites or online services must not sell sensitive data. Data brokers and data collectors must annually register with the Division of Consumer Affairs, pay registration fees, and submit specified information including data collection practices, opt-out methods, breach history, and practices specific to persons under 18.
Oklahoma
Enacted
HB 2289: Judicial and elected official security and privacy; creating the Oklahoma Elected Official and Judicial Security and Privacy Act of 2025; effective date; emergency.
State agencies must not publicly post or display covered information of at-risk individuals or their immediate families. Upon written request, state agencies must remove such covered information from publicly available content within seventy-two hours. At-risk individuals may file notice with state agencies to mark their covered information as private.
Took effect 1 July 2025
Oregon
Enacted
SB 1587: Relating to data brokers; and prescribing an effective date.
A public body may not disclose personally identifiable information to a data broker unless the data broker first provides written attestation that the information will not be sold or transferred to any entity that will use it to enforce federal immigration law. A public body must reject attestations it reasonably believes contain material misrepresentations, falsehoods, or omissions.
Rhode Island
Enacted
HB 7640: An act relating to courts and civil procedure--courts -- court administration
State, county, and municipal agencies must remove personal information of protected individuals and immediate family members from public content within 72 hours of written notice and cannot publicly post such information without written permission. Data aggregators and persons must remove such information from publicly available content within 10 business days and cannot sell, license, or provide it for consideration.
Enacted
HB 5892: An act relating to courts and civil procedure -- courts -- court administration
State, county, and municipal agencies must remove and not publicly post personal information of protected individuals and immediate family members within 72 hours of receiving written notice. Data aggregators and other persons must not sell or provide such personal information and must remove it from public websites within 10 business days of written request.
Took effect 1 January 2026
South Carolina
Enacted
S 126: Law Enforcement Personal Privacy Protection and Judicial Personal Privacy Protection
State and local government agencies must restrict personal contact information of active or former law enforcement officers and judges from publicly available internet websites upon submission of a designated form and notarized affidavit. Restricted information must remain in official records but not appear in indexes or images displayed online, with limited exceptions for subpoena, court order, or consent.
Took effect 1 January 2026
Texas
Enacted
HB 5081: Relating to the protection of personal identifying information of certain individuals in the judicial system; creating a criminal offense.
A person may not knowingly sell, license, trade, transfer, or disseminate covered information of at-risk individuals or their immediate family members after receiving a written request to stop. A person may not publicly post or display such covered information on a publicly accessible Internet website after receiving a written request. A person other than a data broker must remove covered information from websites within 10 business days of receiving a removal request.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Enacted
SB 1343: Relating to the notice requirements of a data broker registration statement and Internet website.
A data broker that maintains an Internet website or mobile application must post a conspicuous notice stating the entity is a data broker, clear and not misleading, readily accessible including to individuals with disabilities, containing language provided by rule of the secretary of state, and informing consumers how to exercise consumer rights under Chapter 541. A data broker's registration statement must include a link to a page providing consumers with prominent instructions on how to exercise consumer rights under Section 541.051 and other applicable data privacy rights under Chapter 541.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Enacted
SB 2121: Relating to the regulation of certain business entities that act as data brokers.
Amends the definition of data broker to mean a business entity that collects, processes, or transfers personal data not collected directly from the individual to whom it is linked. A data broker is subject to this chapter if it derives more than 50 percent of revenue from processing or transferring such personal data, or processes personal data of more than 50,000 individuals, in a 12-month period.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Utah
Enacted
SB 290: Victim and Witness Privacy Amendments
Law enforcement agencies and prosecuting agencies must establish policies ensuring nonpublic victim or witness data is used solely for legitimate law enforcement and prosecutorial purposes and maintained in a controlled environment protecting victim or witness privacy. Defendants' attorneys may access such data through virtual rooms, facility viewing, or court-ordered copies subject to protective orders and restrictions.
Took effect 6 May 2026
Vermont
Enacted
H 211: An act relating to data brokers and personal information
Providers of educational technology products must register with the Secretary of State and report the name and addresses of the provider, privacy policies and terms of conditions for each product, schools where products operate under paid contracts, product names and descriptions, and attestation that products meet student privacy standards and federal and state privacy laws.
Wisconsin
Enacted
SB 169: Relating to: privacy protections for judicial officers.
Government agencies, businesses, associations, and data brokers must not publicly post or display personal information of judicial officers who submit written requests, except as specified. Providers of public-facing land records websites must establish opt-out processes for judicial officers' names. Registers of deeds must shield electronic recorded documents specifically identified by judicial officers.
Bills that moved most recently
The 25 open data brokers and people-search bills with the latest action. The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker follows all 92.
New Jersey S 4806: Requires data brokers to delete certain data upon consumer request; establishes "Data Broker Fund."
In committee
District of Columbia B 26-0655: Protecting Judicial Privacy Act of 2026
What it would do: Prohibits government agencies and private entities from publicly displaying judicial officers' personal information (home address, phone numbers, email, social security number, children's identities) upon written request, with removal deadlines of 5 business days for agencies and 48 hours for private entities.
In committee
Congress H.R. 6488: RESET Act
What it would do: Prohibits covered platforms from allowing individuals under 16 to create or maintain accounts. Requires platforms to identify and terminate existing minor accounts within 180 days, delete their personal data, and allow 90-day access to download data. Violations are treated as FTC unfair practices.
In committee
Virginia HB 638: Data brokers; regulation, civil penalties.
What it would do: Creates a data broker regulation chapter requiring data brokers to register annually with the Secretary of the Commonwealth for $100,000, maintain comprehensive information security programs, and prohibit acquiring personally identifiable information through fraudulent means or for stalking, fraud, or discrimination.
In committee
Pennsylvania SB 1396: An Act amending Title 44 (Law and Justice) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in preliminary provisions, providing for public servant data privacy.
What it would do: Prohibits data brokers from disclosing protected information (home address, phone number, Social Security or driver's license number) of governors, legislators, judges, and their associated persons after receiving written notice, with civil liability for violations and lifetime coverage for principal persons.
In committee
New Jersey S 2316: Regulates data brokers, data collectors, and collection and dissemination of certain sensitive information.**
What it would do: Prohibits controllers of commercial websites or online services from selling sensitive data and requires data brokers and data collectors to register annually with the Division of Consumer Affairs, pay tiered registration fees based on consumer numbers, and maintain public registry information.
Passed committee
New Jersey A 5332: Regulates data brokers and collection and dissemination of certain sensitive information.
In committee
New York S 9088: Requires the registration of data brokers and establishing a data deletion mechanism for consumers
What it would do: Requires data brokers to register with the New York attorney general and establish a mechanism allowing consumers to request deletion of their personal information from all registered data brokers through a single request.
Passed chamber
New York A 11388: Provides additional protection to judges and their family members under the Judicial Security Act
What it would do: Expands the definition of personal information protected for judges and their immediate family members to include children of any age and specific record locations, and requires employers to notify specified parties to cease public disclosure within 72 hours of a written request.
Passed chamber
Illinois SB 3219: Personal info-broker registry
What it would do: Requires data brokers operating in Illinois to register annually with the Attorney General by January 31, pay a registration fee, and disclose specified information about their data collection practices. Creates a Data Broker Registry Fund to support enforcement and website maintenance.
In committee
California SB 1104: California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: data broker registration: accessible deletion mechanism.
What it would do: Amends data broker registration requirements to include disclosures about inferences sold regarding minors and reproductive health data. Establishes an accessible deletion mechanism allowing consumers to request deletion from all data brokers simultaneously, and creates a privacy preference profile tool to help consumers identify brokers with consistent practices.
Passed committee
Ohio HB 807: Prohibit selling sensitive personal data for profit
What it would do: Prohibits state and local agencies and private entities from selling sensitive personal data to data brokers or private entities for profit unless used for permitted purposes like credit evaluation, employment, or child support enforcement, with exceptions for informed consent, court orders, or legal requirements.
In committee
Congress H.R. 8787: Servicemember Payment Data Privacy and Security Act
What it would do: Prohibits the Secretary of Defense from contracting with retailers using payment processing equipment, systems, or services developed or controlled by China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or other countries designated as national security risks, effective January 1, 2027.
In committee
Alaska HB 367: An Act relating to the privacy of consumer personal information; establishing the Consumer Personal Information Privacy Act; establishing data broker registration requirements; relating to social security numbers; making certain violations unfair or deceptive trade practices; and providing for an effective date.
What it would do: Establishes the Consumer Personal Information Privacy Act requiring businesses to notify consumers before collecting personal information, limit collection to necessary purposes, and honor consumer requests to access, delete, or prevent sale of personal data. Creates data broker registration requirements and makes violations unfair trade practices.
In committee
New York A 10911: Prohibits data brokers from selling the personal information of current and former military service members
In committee
Illinois SB 3491: Judicial privacy act
In committee
New Mexico SB 192: Data broker privacy act
What it would do: Requires data brokers to register with New Mexico's economic development department, establish a centralized deletion mechanism allowing consumers to request deletion of personal information from all registered brokers within 45 days, and report annually on deletion requests and response times.
In committee
Minnesota HF 4456: Data brokers required to register with the attorney general, account established, enforcement and civil penalties provided, and money appropriated.
What it would do: Requires data brokers to register with the attorney general and pay a registration fee before collecting or selling consumer personal data. Establishes a public registry and allows the attorney general to enforce violations through civil action with penalties under existing consumer protection law.
In committee
New Jersey A 4083: Expands "Daniel's Law" to prohibit disclosure of personal information concerning court administrators and deputy court administrators.
In committee
New Jersey A 4436: Expands "Daniel's Law" protections; requires Office of Information Privacy to establish portal for prohibiting disclosure of personal information by private entities and establishes penalties for failure to comply.
In committee
Maryland HB 1220: Business Regulation - Data Broker Registry
What it would do: Establishes a data broker registry requiring data brokers to register annually with the Comptroller by January 31, submit specified information and fees, and declare whether they handle geolocation data, consumer health data, and opt-out options. Violators face $200 daily fines plus investigation expenses.
In committee
Maryland HB 1089: Consumer Protection - Data Broker Registry - Establishment
What it would do: Requires data brokers operating in or collecting data on Maryland residents to register annually with the Attorney General beginning January 31, 2028, submit specified information, and pay a tiered fee. Establishes a public searchable database of registered data brokers and imposes civil fines up to $10,000 per violation.
In committee
West Virginia SB 965: Providing protection of personal information of certain attorneys
In committee
West Virginia HB 5427: To prohibit the malicious publication of personally identifiable information with intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, stalk, or facilitate harm.
What it would do: Creates the Anti-Doxxing and Privacy Protection Act, prohibiting knowing publication of personally identifiable information without consent with intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, stalk, or facilitate harm, establishing criminal penalties up to five years imprisonment and civil remedies including statutory damages of $1,000 to $25,000.
In committee
Massachusetts H 1766: An Act relative to judicial security
In committee
Data brokers and people-search laws, state by state
- New Jersey11 bills, 1 enacted
- Florida5 bills
- Texas5 bills, 3 enacted
- Congress5 bills, 1 enacted
- Massachusetts4 bills
- Maryland4 bills
- New York4 bills
- Vermont4 bills, 1 enacted
- California3 bills, 2 enacted
- Illinois3 bills
- Oklahoma3 bills, 1 enacted
- Rhode Island3 bills, 2 enacted
- Arizona2 bills
- Connecticut2 bills
- Georgia2 bills, 1 enacted
- Kentucky2 bills, 1 enacted
- Michigan2 bills
- Minnesota2 bills
- North Carolina2 bills
- Pennsylvania2 bills
- South Carolina2 bills, 1 enacted
- Washington2 bills
- Wisconsin2 bills, 1 enacted
- West Virginia2 bills
- Alaska1 bill
- District of Columbia1 bill
- Delaware1 bill, 1 enacted
- Hawaii1 bill
- Indiana1 bill
- Montana1 bill
- Nebraska1 bill
- New Hampshire1 bill
- New Mexico1 bill
- Ohio1 bill
- Oregon1 bill, 1 enacted
- Tennessee1 bill
- Utah1 bill, 1 enacted
- Virginia1 bill
Questions
Which states have data brokers and people-search laws?
States that enacted data brokers and people-search laws in 2025 and 2026: Texas (3), California (2), Rhode Island (2), Delaware (1), Georgia (1), Kentucky (1), New Jersey (1), Oklahoma (1), Oregon (1), South Carolina (1), Utah (1), Vermont (1) and Wisconsin (1). Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed here.
Which states have the most data brokers and people-search bills?
New Jersey (11), Florida (5), Texas (5), Congress (5) and Massachusetts (4). In all, 92 bills in 38 jurisdictions, the latest action on 15 October 2026.
What do data brokers and people-search bills cover?
Registration and deletion duties for data brokers, people-search sites, and protection of public officials' home addresses. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.
Is this legal advice?
No. Which bills count as data brokers and people-search bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Follow data brokers and people-search bills in every state
The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.