Health and genetic data laws by state
176 bills on health and genetic data in 41 jurisdictions, 35 of them enacted in 2025 and 2026. The laws come first, with what each requires, then the bills that moved most recently.
- 35 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 16 states. Most: California (6), Texas (4), Virginia (4).
- 176 bills in 41 jurisdictions, 14 of them in Congress. Latest action 5 October 2026.
Updated 2 November 2026LawsRecent billsBy state
Enacted in 2025 and 2026
35 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.
California
Enacted
AB 1798: Genetic testing for life and disability insurance.
Life or disability insurers must not cancel, limit, deny coverage, or make adverse underwriting decisions based on genetic characteristics or genetic test results, except for life or disability policies with face value exceeding $1,500,000 where test results are in the medical record and not from direct-to-consumer tests. Insurers must not require, request, or use genetic information for insurance purposes.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
AB 1883: Workplace surveillance tools.
An employer shall not use a workplace surveillance tool to prevent compliance with laws, infer protected activity, make inferences about emotional state or gait, or collect neural data. An employer shall not use facial recognition technology to make inferences about a worker for firing, deactivation, or disciplinary purposes. An employer shall not use a workplace surveillance tool to infer a worker's protected status.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
AB 2448: Medical information: confidentiality.
A business that electronically stores or maintains medical information on sensitive services for healthcare providers, service plans, pharmaceutical companies, contractors, or employers must develop capabilities, policies, and procedures by July 1, 2024, to limit user access to gender affirming care, abortion, abortion-related services, and contraception information; prevent disclosure of such information outside the state; segregate such information; and automatically disable access by out-of-state individuals and entities.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 278: Health data: HIV test results.
A provider of health care may disclose HIV test results identifying a Medi-Cal beneficiary without written authorization to the beneficiary's assigned Medi-Cal managed care plan and to external quality review organizations, for quality improvement programs including value-based payment and healthy behavior incentive programs. A Medi-Cal managed care plan may disclose de-identified HIV test results to State Department of Health Care Services staff for the same purpose.
Enacted
SB 497: Legally protected health care activity.
Providers of health care, health care service plans, and contractors must not release medical information related to individuals seeking or obtaining gender-affirming health care or mental health care in response to subpoenas based on another state's laws that interfere with such rights. State and local agencies must not provide CURES data or resources to further out-of-state investigations based on another state's laws regarding legally protected health care activity.
Enacted
AB 45: Privacy: health data: location and research.
Persons must not collect, use, disclose, sell, share, or retain personal information of natural persons physically located at or within a precise geolocation of a family planning center, except as necessary to perform requested services or goods. Persons must not geofence entities providing in-person health care services in California to identify, track, collect information from, or send notifications or advertisements to persons seeking or providing health care services.
Took effect 1 January 2026
Colorado
Enacted
SB 25-129: Legally Protected Health-Care Activity Protections
Public entities and persons or entities licensed or regulated by the state must not provide information, resources, or assistance to out-of-state or federal investigations seeking to impose liability for legally protected health-care activities. Practitioners may request prescription labels for mifepristone or misoprostol list the health-care practice name instead of the practitioner's name.
Delaware
Enacted
HB 424: An act to amend title 16 relating to autism surveillance and registration.
Repeals Delaware's autism surveillance and registration program that required healthcare practitioners and hospitals to report autism diagnoses in children to the Department of Health and Social Services. Requires the Department to expunge all protected health information collected under the program within 6 months, though aggregate data may be retained.
Illinois
Enacted
SB 2886: Genetic info privacy-biomarker
Insurers may not seek or use genetic or biomarker testing information for accident and health insurance except when an individual voluntarily submits favorable results. Employers, employment agencies, labor organizations, and licensing agencies must not solicit, require, or use genetic or biomarker testing information in employment decisions. Persons must not disclose genetic or biomarker test results identifying the subject except to authorized recipients.
Enacted
HB 5295: Reproductive health privacy
Electronic health networks must prevent disclosure of patients' coded private health care information related to abortion, gender dysphoria, and abortion-related services to out-of-state providers unless for technical support, quality assurance, payment, health care operations, or with patient consent. Electronic health networks must develop technological capabilities to parse, segregate, and allow patients to control sharing of such information.
Takes effect 1 July 2027
Enacted
HB 3487: Bhwc data collection
The Department of Financial and Professional Regulation must collect demographic and professional data from behavioral health professionals at initial licensure application and license renewal, ensure the data collection process is secure and complies with privacy laws, and publish aggregated de-identified data annually by January 31 on its website and through accessible formats.
Took effect 1 January 2026
Indiana
Enacted
HB 1521: Consumer genetic testing providers.
Consumer genetic testing providers must obtain freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous consent before performing additional testing, using biological material for other purposes, providing third-party access, retaining material or data beyond thirty days, disseminating marketing based on results, or sharing service usage information. Providers must implement commercially reasonable security measures, allow individual data access, provide revocation procedures, and may never provide non-deidentified genetic data to insurers, insurance data providers, or employers.
Took effect 1 July 2025
Kentucky
Enacted
HB 676: AN ACT relating to the Kentucky statewide health data utility.
Participants including health facilities, health care payers, and health care professionals must submit health information to the Kentucky statewide health data utility according to requirements established by the executive director, within three months after the relevant exchange becomes operational or when the person begins doing business requiring compliance.
Enacted
HB 473: AN ACT relating to consumer data privacy.
Controllers that conduct business in Kentucky and control or process personal data of at least 100,000 consumers, or 25,000 consumers while deriving over 50% of gross revenue from selling personal data, must conduct and document data protection impact assessments for targeted advertising, selling personal data, profiling with reasonably foreseeable risks, sensitive data processing, and other heightened-risk processing.
Maine
Enacted
LD 1970: An Act To Amend The Laws Regarding Consent For Hiv Testing And Disclosure Of Related Medical Information For Insurance Purposes
Health care providers must obtain a patient's informed consent before performing an HIV test, except for repeated testing to monitor established infection. Patients must be informed orally or in writing about what HIV infection involves and the meaning of test results, and must have the opportunity to ask questions. Health care providers may disclose HIV test results to other health care providers working directly with the patient only for direct medical or dental care purposes.
Enacted
LD 1945: An Act To Clarify Data Collection Processes In Health Care Facilities
Changes the age threshold for health care facilities collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data from 18 years of age or older to 19 years of age or older.
Maryland
Enacted
HB 1007: Disability and Life Insurance - Medical Information (Genetic Testing Protection Act)
Insurance carriers offering life, long-term care, or disability insurance in Maryland may not unfairly discriminate based on medical information lacking actuarially sound relationship to insurance risk. Carriers may not access sensitive medical information or genetic data without written consent, mandate genetic testing or genome sequencing, or use genetic test results to deny, limit, cancel, or affect coverage.
Took effect 1 October 2025
Enacted
HB 301: Criminal Procedure - Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search - Affidavit for Judicial Authorization
Law enforcement agents with prosecutor approval must submit a sworn affidavit to obtain judicial authorization before initiating forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search. The affidavit must assert that the perpetrator's identity is unknown, the crime involves murder, rape, felony sexual offense, or substantial ongoing threat to public safety or national security, the forensic sample is biological material reasonably believed deposited by a perpetrator, and an STR DNA profile was developed, entered into state and national databases, and failed to identify a known individual.
Took effect 1 October 2025
Montana
Enacted
HB 590: Generally revise laws related to electronic health care records
Health carriers must establish and maintain five types of application programming interfaces for insureds and contracted providers by the earliest date required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Health care providers requesting medical laboratory tests may not engage in information blocking. Certain test results must be disclosed to patients within 72 hours or when the provider directs release, whichever is first.
Enacted
SB 163: Generally revise privacy laws related to biometric, genetic, and neural data
Entities that collect genetic or neurotechnology data must obtain express consent from consumers before collection, use, or disclosure; provide privacy notices; implement security programs; and allow consumers to access, delete, and revoke consent for their data. Entities may not disclose such data to insurers or employers without express consent. Government agencies may not search consumer DNA or neurotechnology databases without a search warrant or investigative subpoena.
Rhode Island
Enacted
HB 7639: An act relating to commercial law--general regulatory provisions -- genetic information privacy act
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies must provide consumers clear privacy information and obtain express consent before collecting, using, or disclosing genetic data. Companies must implement reasonable security procedures, enable consumers to access or delete their data, and prohibit service providers from retaining or using genetic data beyond specified purposes.
South Dakota
Enacted
SB 49: safeguard the integrity, privacy, and security of genetic data and provide a civil penalty therefor.
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies must obtain express consent before collecting, disclosing, or using consumers' genetic data, provide privacy policies and notices in plain language, implement security programs, and honor consent revocations within thirty days. Service providers must maintain the same confidentiality obligations.
Took effect 1 July 2026
Texas
Enacted
HB 130: Relating to genetic information security for residents of this state; providing a civil penalty; providing a private cause of action.
Medical facilities, research facilities, companies, and nonprofit organizations conducting genome sequencing in Texas must not use genome sequencers or software from foreign adversaries, must not store genomic data in foreign adversary countries, must not sell genomic data to foreign adversaries in bankruptcy, and must certify annual compliance to the attorney general.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Enacted
HB 4224: Relating to information regarding consumer access to health care records.
A covered entity must prominently post on its Internet website and at any facility detailed instructions for consumers to request their health care records, contact the disciplinary or licensing authority, and file a consumer complaint. This requirement does not apply to entities that only conduct claims processing, data processing, data analysis, utilization review, or billing on behalf of other covered entities.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Enacted
HB 4377: Relating to the retention of certain genetic material and genetic information by the Department of Family and Protective Services.
The Department of Family and Protective Services and any testing laboratory it contracts with must promptly destroy genetic material and delete genetic information obtained from individuals for genetic testing after the testing purpose is accomplished. The department must retain genetic test results, which remain confidential. All testing laboratories must comply by January 1, 2026.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Enacted
SB 922: Relating to the disclosure of certain medical information by electronic means.
Physicians must provide requested medical information within 15 business days of receiving written consent or request. Persons administering or controlling electronic health records must not disclose sensitive test results by electronic means before the third day after the results are finalized. Sensitive test results are pathology or radiology reports with reasonable likelihood of malignancy findings or test results revealing genetic markers.
Took effect 1 September 2025
Utah
Enacted
HB 199: Health Data Amendments
The Department of Health and Human Services must develop and maintain written plans for collecting, managing, and using health data, including strategic, data management, and analytics plans published on its website. The department must establish an opt-out system allowing individuals to suppress their identifiable health data and may not disclose identifiable health data except as specifically authorized by the act.
Took effect 6 May 2026
Enacted
HB 182: Genetic Information Amendments
Medical facilities and genomic research facilities must not use genetic sequencers or operational and research software produced by, distributed by, or domiciled within foreign adversaries. They must not store genetic sequencing data within foreign adversary boundaries and must ensure data security through encryption and access restrictions. By December 31, 2028, they must provide sworn compliance statements to the attorney general.
Takes effect 1 January 2028
Vermont
Enacted
H 639: An act relating to genetic data privacy
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies must obtain express consent for collection, use, and disclosure of genetic data; provide clear privacy notices; implement security procedures; enable consumer access and deletion; prohibit service providers from retaining data for other purposes; and refrain from disclosing genetic data to insurance or employment entities without a search warrant or express consent.
Took effect 1 July 2026
Enacted
H 814: An act relating to neurological rights and the use of artificial intelligence technology in health and human services
Persons must obtain written informed consent before collecting, recording, or sharing neural data from brain-computer interfaces and must not allow brain-computer interfaces to bypass conscious decision-making without specific written consent for each category of action. Health care providers using generative AI for patient communications must include disclaimers and contact instructions. Suppliers of mental health chatbots must protect user data, disclose AI use, and comply with safety and privacy requirements. Health plans using AI for utilization review must base determinations on individual clinical information and not deny services based solely on AI recommendations.
Took effect 1 July 2026
Virginia
Enacted
HB 1019: Health Coordination Network Program; patient data collection.
The Commissioner of Health must contract with a nonprofit organization to create, operate, and maintain the Health Coordination Network Program, which receives real-time patient visit information from all hospitals and shares it with participants including health care providers, insurance carriers, and public health agencies to facilitate care coordination and improve quality of care.
Took effect 1 July 2026
Enacted
HB 603: Virginia All-Payer Claims Database; disclosure of information, limitation.
Data suppliers including health insurers, third-party administrators, and government health plans must submit paid claims data to the Virginia All-Payer Claims Database. The nonprofit organization must protect patient privacy, not disclose provider-specific reimbursement information beyond what is publicly available, and provide affected entities 30 days to review accuracy before public release of reports naming providers or where one provider represents 60 percent or more of data.
Took effect 1 July 2026
Enacted
HB 1937: Acute psychiatric bed registry; patient privacy and data security, etc.
Every state facility, community services board, behavioral health authority, and private inpatient provider licensed by the Department must participate in the acute psychiatric bed registry and update bed availability information whenever there is a change or at least daily. The Commissioner must create a Bed Registry Advisory Council to review and approve all data access requests and ensure compliance with privacy laws.
Took effect 1 July 2025
Enacted
SB 1439: Acute psychiatric bed registry; patient privacy and data security, etc.
Every state facility, community services board, behavioral health authority, and private inpatient provider licensed by the Department must participate in the acute psychiatric bed registry and designate employees to submit information about bed availability whenever there is a change or at least daily. The Department must develop and administer the registry and create an Advisory Council to review and approve data access requests.
Took effect 1 July 2025
Washington
Enacted
HB 1382: Modernizing the all payers claim database.
The health care authority must establish or select a lead organization through competitive procurement to coordinate and manage a statewide all-payer health care claims database. Data vendors must collect, process, and secure claims data from carriers, third-party administrators, and public programs. The lead organization must release data only in compliance with privacy protections and established procedures.
Bills that moved most recently
The 25 open health and genetic data bills with the latest action. The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker follows all 176.
New Jersey S 4065: Prohibits wearable technology companies from selling users' health information without consent.
What it would do: Prohibits wearable technology companies from selling or offering to sell consumers' health information collected by their devices without the consumer's express written consent.
Passed committee
Congress H.R. 10568: Protecting Biological Data as Critical Infrastructure Act
In committee
Michigan HB 6337: Insurance: insurers; use of genetic information in life insurance policies; prohibit. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding sec. 4003.
In committee
Congress H.R. 9228: Health DATA Act of 2026
What it would do: Amends ERISA to require group health plans have access to de-identified claims, encounter, and pricing information from network service providers within 15 days, prohibits contractual restrictions on such access, and imposes civil penalties up to $10,000 per day for violations.
Passed committee
Congress S. 3097: Health Information Privacy Reform Act
What it would do: Requires HHS and FTC to establish privacy, security, and breach notification standards for health information held by non-HIPAA entities, extending HIPAA-like protections to regulated entities and service providers, and mandates patient notifications when health data leaves HIPAA protections.
Passed committee
Congress H.R. 9482: Health and Location Data Protection Act of 2026
In committee
Rhode Island HB 7357: An act relating to health and safety -- sensitive healthcare information privacy act
What it would do: Creates the Sensitive Healthcare Information Privacy Act requiring regulated entities and small businesses to obtain consumer consent before collecting reproductive or gender-affirming care data, prohibiting sales without authorization, and establishing consumer rights to access, delete, and withdraw consent for such data by January 1, 2027.
Passed chamber
Michigan SB 769: Corrections: state facilities; medical information regarding a prisoner provided to individuals as authorized by a prisoner; allow. Amends 1953 PA 232 (MCL 791.201 - 791.285) by adding sec. 64a.
Passed committee
Pennsylvania SB 1350: An Act amending the act of December 17, 1968 (P.L.1224, No.387), known as the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, further providing for definitions and for unlawful acts or practices and exclusions; and providing for conduct relating to reproductive health data and sexual health data.
What it would do: Amends Pennsylvania's consumer protection law to prohibit covered entities and processors from collecting, processing, selling or disclosing reproductive health data and sexual health data without explicit written consent, with limited exceptions for providing requested services, financial transactions, legal compliance, and public safety.
In committee
Rhode Island SB 3256: An act relating to health and safety -- public health data privacy and protection act
What it would do: Creates Chapter 106 establishing that reportable disease data held by the Rhode Island Department of Health is confidential and not a public record, permitting release only of de-identified data for public health purposes and as authorized by the department or federal law.
Passed chamber
New York S 9269: Provides for the protection of health information
What it would do: Creates the New York Health Information Privacy Act, requiring regulated entities to obtain individual authorization before processing health information, prohibiting sales of health data to third parties, and establishing individual rights to access and delete their health information.
Passed chamber
Illinois HB 3494: Health data privacy act
What it would do: Creates the Protect Health Data Privacy Act requiring regulated entities to disclose health data privacy policies, obtain individual consent before collecting or selling health data, and prohibiting discriminatory practices. Provides individuals rights to confirm data collection, request deletion, and withdraw consent, with private right of action and Attorney General enforcement.
In committee
Illinois SB 2994: Genetic privacy-neurotech
What it would do: Removes an exclusion for nonneural information from the definition of neurotechnology data and requires a search warrant or investigative subpoena based on probable cause to access consumer neurotechnology database search results.
In committee
New York S 1633: Provides additional protections for sensitive health information and requires patients to have the right to restrict the disclosures of such patient's health information
What it would do: Requires health information networks and electronic health records systems to allow patients to restrict disclosures of sensitive health information including reproductive health, gender-affirming care, mental health, and substance use treatment, and to notify patients before complying with legal inquiries for such information.
Passed chamber
Missouri HB 3197: Establishes provisions requiring genetic testing at birth for paternity and child support purposes
What it would do: Requires genetic testing at birth for all newborns in Missouri when a putative father is identified, paternity is disputed, or testing is requested, beginning January 1, 2027. Establishes that paternity is legally recognized only upon genetic test confirming at least 99 percent biological relationship, and prohibits child support obligations or penalties prior to genetic confirmation.
In committee
New York S 7713: Restricts the use of automatic license plate reader information
What it would do: Prohibits automatic license plate reader users from selling, sharing, or transferring captured plate data to investigate or enforce laws denying reproductive or lawful health care services, and requires written declarations from out-of-state law enforcement before sharing such data.
Passed chamber
New Jersey A 5045: Concerns investigative genetic genealogy; appropriates $500,000.
In committee
New York S 2398: Requires genetic testing results only be received by patients and health care providers providing direct care while health insurance companies only receive a record that the genetic testing was performed
What it would do: Prohibits health insurers and life insurers from receiving genetic test results and requires them to accept only confirmation that testing was performed. Allows only patients and their direct care providers to receive actual genetic test results.
Passed chamber
Illinois SB 3771: Reproductive health privacy
What it would do: Creates the Reproductive Health Records Privacy Act requiring health information exchanges to segregate abortion-related medical information and restrict access by out-of-state entities by July 1, 2027, with enforcement through private lawsuits and Attorney General civil actions up to $50,000 in penalties.
In committee
Minnesota SF 4399: Direct Care and Treatment data requirements modification
What it would do: Modifies Direct Care and Treatment data requirements, employee classification procedures, and patient consent processes for medical treatment. Extends voluntary patient transfer and readmission periods from 60 days to 90 days for psychiatric conditions or six months for nonpsychiatric conditions.
Passed committee
Connecticut HB 5168: An act concerning the secure transmission of safety plans of minor patients to schools by health care providers.
What it would do: Requires health care providers to obtain written consent and transmit safety plans for minor patients who received at least twelve consecutive days of inpatient behavioral health care to schools via secure messaging systems on and after April 1, 2027.
Passed committee
Illinois HB 1811: Controlled sub-pmp-interstate
What it would do: Amends the Illinois Controlled Substances Act to require interstate Prescription Monitoring Program data sharing agreements to be mutual, with reciprocal states providing equal access to all authorized users, licensed health care entities, and application vendors regardless of connection method.
Passed committee
Michigan HB 5769: Consumer protection: privacy; reproductive health data privacy act; create. Creates new act.
What it would do: Creates the Reproductive Health Data Privacy Act requiring regulated entities to obtain individual consent before collecting, processing, or selling reproductive health data, prohibits geofences around reproductive health facilities, and establishes civil remedies for violations including damages of $100 to $750 per incident.
In committee
Oklahoma HB 3647: Health information; creating the Oklahoma Health Care Transparency Initiative Act of 2026; requiring and authorizing submission of certain data; providing data privacy and security protections; providing penalties; establishing Health Care Cost Transparency Board.
What it would do: Creates the Oklahoma Health Care Transparency Initiative requiring health insurers with at least 2,000 covered individuals to submit claims data and demographic information to a state-designated entity beginning July 1, 2027, with fines up to $1,000 per day for non-compliance.
Passed chamber
Missouri HB 2606: Creates provisions relating to the privacy rights of patients
What it would do: Establishes patient privacy rights over health records, requiring health care providers to obtain informed consent before disclosing records and prohibiting conditioning treatment on consent decisions. Allows civil actions for violations with damages of $1,000 to $10,000 per occurrence.
In committee
Health and genetic data laws, state by state
- New Jersey26 bills
- Congress14 bills
- Illinois11 bills, 3 enacted
- New York10 bills
- California8 bills, 6 enacted
- Rhode Island8 bills, 1 enacted
- Texas8 bills, 4 enacted
- Montana7 bills, 2 enacted
- New Mexico6 bills
- Vermont6 bills, 2 enacted
- Connecticut5 bills
- Michigan5 bills
- Virginia5 bills, 4 enacted
- Maryland4 bills, 2 enacted
- Minnesota4 bills
- Pennsylvania4 bills
- Wisconsin4 bills
- Kentucky3 bills, 2 enacted
- Massachusetts3 bills
- Missouri3 bills
- Utah3 bills, 2 enacted
- West Virginia3 bills
- Alabama2 bills
- Hawaii2 bills
- Maine2 bills, 2 enacted
- Mississippi2 bills
- Nebraska2 bills
- Oklahoma2 bills
- South Carolina2 bills
- Colorado1 bill, 1 enacted
- Delaware1 bill, 1 enacted
- Georgia1 bill
- Iowa1 bill
- Idaho1 bill
- Indiana1 bill, 1 enacted
- Kansas1 bill
- Louisiana1 bill
- New Hampshire1 bill
- Nevada1 bill
- South Dakota1 bill, 1 enacted
- Washington1 bill, 1 enacted
Questions
Which states have health and genetic data laws?
States that enacted health and genetic data laws in 2025 and 2026: California (6), Texas (4), Virginia (4), Illinois (3), Kentucky (2), Maine (2), Maryland (2), Montana (2), Utah (2), Vermont (2), Colorado (1), Delaware (1), Indiana (1), Rhode Island (1), South Dakota (1) and Washington (1). Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed here.
Which states have the most health and genetic data bills?
New Jersey (26), Congress (14), Illinois (11), New York (10) and California (8). In all, 176 bills in 41 jurisdictions, the latest action on 5 October 2026.
What do health and genetic data bills cover?
Health, reproductive, neural and genetic information outside HIPAA, including genetic testing and DNA. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.
Is this legal advice?
No. Which bills count as health and genetic data bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Follow health and genetic data bills in every state
The Data Privacy Legislation Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.