Transparency and disclosure laws by state
167 bills on transparency and disclosure in 40 jurisdictions, 18 of them enacted in 2025 and 2026. The laws come first, with what each requires, then the bills that moved most recently.
- 18 laws enacted in 2025 and 2026, in 9 states. Most: California (9), New York (2), Arkansas (1).
- 167 bills in 40 jurisdictions, 17 of them in Congress. Latest action 22 October 2026.
Updated 2 November 2026LawsRecent billsBy state
Enacted in 2025 and 2026
18 laws, by state. Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed.
Arkansas
Enacted
HB 1876: Regarding the ownership of model training and content generated by a generative artificial intelligence tool.
This amendment adds Senator J. Bryant as a cosponsor to House Bill 1876, which addresses ownership of model training data and content generated by generative artificial intelligence tools.
California
Enacted
AB 2713: California AI Transparency Act: system provenance data.
A large online platform must detect system provenance data embedded into, attached to, or associated with distributed content. It must provide a user interface indicating whether content was generated or substantially altered by a GenAI system and allow users to inspect provenance data through its interface, a link to a third-party site, or downloadable format. A large online platform must not knowingly strip provenance data or digital signatures from content uploaded, distributed, or downloaded on the platform.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 1000: California AI Transparency Act.
A covered provider that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative AI system publicly accessible in California must make available a disclosure verification tool at no cost that allows users to assess whether content was created or altered by the system and outputs detected system provenance data. A covered provider must include a latent disclosure in AI-generated or altered content conveying the provider's name, system name and version, creation or alteration time and date, unique identifier, and whether the system created or altered the content.
Enacted
SB 1159: Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance.
A person must not knowingly use artificial intelligence to falsely represent that a natural person appeared before, submitted information to, or otherwise engaged with a governmental agency. Governmental agencies may use disclosure verification tools to determine if artificial intelligence is present in engagement with transparency and governance laws.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 503: Health care services: artificial intelligence.
Developers and deployers of artificial intelligence systems used to support clinical decisionmaking or health care resource allocation must make reasonable efforts to identify and mitigate risks of biased impacts in system outputs. Deployers must regularly monitor these systems and take reasonable steps to mitigate bias. Beginning January 1, 2027, developers must report compliance efforts to the department before commercial deployment.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 574: Attorneys, arbitrators, judicial officers, and alternative resolution providers.
Attorneys using generative artificial intelligence must ensure confidential information is not entered into public AI systems, verify accuracy of AI material, correct erroneous output, and not file citations they have not personally read and verified. Arbitrators must not delegate decisionmaking to AI tools and must disclose AI use to parties. Judicial officers must disclose whether they or others relied on generative artificial intelligence in researching or drafting orders or rulings.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
SB 1050: False advertising: synthetic performers.
A person who creates and causes to be published an advertisement that prominently includes a synthetic performer must include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the advertisement includes a synthetic performer. An advertising medium must not transmit, distribute, display, air, or otherwise make available an advertisement containing a synthetic performer if a court has issued an order finding a violation and the medium is served with that order.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
AB 316: Artificial intelligence: defenses.
A defendant who developed, modified, or used artificial intelligence may not assert as a defense that the artificial intelligence autonomously caused harm to the plaintiff. Defendants may still present other affirmative defenses and evidence regarding causation, foreseeability, and comparative fault.
Enacted
AB 853: California AI Transparency Act.
Beginning August 2, 2026, covered providers must make available a free AI detection tool assessing whether content was created or altered by their generative AI system. Beginning January 1, 2027, large online platforms must detect and disclose system provenance data in content, and GenAI hosting platforms must not make available systems lacking required disclosures. Beginning January 1, 2028, capture device manufacturers must provide users an option to include latent disclosures in captured content.
Enacted
AB 489: Health care professions: deceptive terms or letters: artificial intelligence.
Entities that develop or deploy artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence systems must not use terms, letters, or phrases in advertising or functionality that indicate or imply the advice, care, reports, or assessments are provided by a natural person with an appropriate health care license or certificate.
Maine
Enacted
LD 1727: An Act To Ensure Transparency In Consumer Transactions Involving Artificial Intelligence
A person may not use an artificial intelligence chatbot or other computer technology to engage in a commercial transaction or trade practice with a consumer in a manner that may mislead or deceive a reasonable consumer into believing they are engaging with a human being unless the consumer is notified in a clear and conspicuous manner that they are not engaging with a human being.
New York
Enacted
S 8828: Relates to transparency and safety requirements for developers of artificial intelligence models
Large frontier developers must write, implement, and publish a frontier AI framework describing how they assess and mitigate catastrophic risks from their frontier models. Large frontier developers must file disclosure statements with the office and pay assessments. All frontier developers must report critical safety incidents to the office within seventy-two hours of determination or learning facts establishing reasonable belief.
Takes effect 1 January 2027
Enacted
S 8420: Relates to requiring advertisements to disclose the use of a synthetic performer
Any person engaged in the business of dealing in property or service who produces an advertisement for commercial purposes must conspicuously disclose in the advertisement that a synthetic performer is present, where the person has actual knowledge. This applies across all media except audio advertisements and language translation of human performers.
Took effect 9 June 2026
Pennsylvania
Enacted
SB 806: An Act providing for unfair methods of competition and for enforcement and penalties.
Any person is prohibited from knowingly or recklessly creating, distributing or publishing artificial intelligence-generated content without clear and conspicuous disclosure. The disclosure must state the content was generated using artificial intelligence, be displayed when content is first presented to the consumer, be readily noticeable and understandable, and be presented in the same medium as the content.
Takes effect 21 December 2026
Rhode Island
Enacted
HB 7538: An act relating to health and safety -- use of artificial intelligence by healthcare providers notification act
Healthcare providers and healthcare facilities that employ artificial intelligence to document in-person or telehealth visits must notify patients of the AI use for that purpose and review the AI-generated documentation for accuracy after each visit.
Utah
Enacted
SB 38: Consumer Protection Modifications
The Division of Consumer Protection must administer and enforce Chapter 77, Generative Artificial Intelligence - Consumer Disclosures and Enforcement, along with existing consumer protection statutes. The division may investigate conduct related to statutes it administers and enforce, issue cease and desist orders, and impose administrative fines.
Virginia
Enacted
SB 1053: Synthetic digital content; definition, penalty, report, effective clause.
Any person is prohibited from using synthetic digital content for the purpose of committing any criminal offense. Synthetic digital content is defined as digital audio, image, text, or video that realistically but falsely depicts an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct and is produced by systems using artificial intelligence based on foundation models.
Washington
Enacted
HB 1170: Informing users when content is developed or modified by artificial intelligence.
Covered providers must offer users a manifest disclosure option identifying AI-generated content and must include a latent disclosure in all AI-generated image, video, or audio content. Covered providers must provide a free AI detection tool and may not collect personal information from tool users except for opted-in feedback contacts.
Bills that moved most recently
The 25 open transparency and disclosure bills with the latest action. The AI Legislation Tracker follows all 167.
New Jersey A 4728: Regulates deceptive use of artificial intelligence in photo advertising of certain dwellings.
What it would do: Prohibits sellers and sellers' agents from using generative artificial intelligence or photo editing software to fundamentally alter dwelling photos in advertisements, except for adding or removing furniture. Requires disclosure of any AI or editing use and imposes civil penalties of $500 for first violations and up to $1,000 for subsequent violations.
Passed committee
Congress H.R. 10814: REAL Political Advertisements Act
In committee
Puerto Rico PC 1487: Para crear la “Ley para la Regulación de Medios Sintéticos y Deepfakes de Puerto Rico”; tipificar conductas relacionadas con la creación, distribución y uso malicioso de contenido sintético generado mediante inteligencia artificial; establecer un régimen penal y civil de responsabilidad; imponer obligaciones de etiquetado, transparencia y trazabilidad a plataformas digitales y proveedores de tecnología de inteligencia artificial; proteger la dignidad, privacidad, integridad electoral y seguridad económica de las personas; establecer programas de educación pública y prevención; designar la agencia reguladora; disponer penalidades; y para otros fines relacionados.
What it would do: Creates criminal and civil liability for creating, distributing, or using deepfakes and synthetic media without consent, imposing 3-8 year sentences depending on the offense. Requires labeling of AI-generated content and establishes obligations for digital platforms and AI technology providers regarding detection, removal, and transparency.
In committee
Pennsylvania HB 2666: An Act providing for limitations on the use of user data in the creation of artificial intelligence simulations and for private right of action; and imposing penalties.
What it would do: Requires digital platforms to obtain explicit opt-in consent before creating AI simulations of users after death or extended inactivity, with mandatory labeling of AI-generated content. Establishes private right of action and allows Attorney General to impose civil penalties of $5,000 to $10,000 per violation.
Passed committee
New Jersey S 4754: Expand existing prohibition against unauthorized practice of various professions to include content produced by or with assistance of artificial intelligence.
In committee
New Jersey S 4758: Requires artificial intelligence companion operators to provide notifications that users are not communicating with human.
In committee
Pennsylvania HB 2534: An Act providing for artificial intelligence transparency, for duties of covered providers of generative artificial intelligence systems and for large online platforms and generative artificial intelligence system hosting platforms; and imposing a penalty.
What it would do: Requires covered generative AI providers with over 1,000,000 monthly active users to provide free detection tools and include manifest and latent disclosures in AI-generated content. Requires large online platforms to detect and display provenance data and prohibits stripping digital signatures from content.
Passed committee
Congress H.R. 10417: VA AI Transparency Act of 2026
In committee
Congress H.R. 10578: AI DATA Act
In committee
Congress S. 5471: AI Systems Transparency Act
In committee
Puerto Rico RKC 45: Para solicitarle al Congreso de los Estados Unidos la aprobación de legislación federal que establezca salvaguardas vinculantes sobre el desarrollo y uso de sistemas de inteligencia artificial, incluyendo evaluaciones independientes previas al lanzamiento de nuevos modelos, deberes de transparencia y notificación de incidentes, 6 capacidad comprobada de suspensión o apagado, protección efectiva a denunciantes de la industria, un régimen claro de responsabilidad civil y supervisión particular sobre agentes autónomos; así como para exigir que Puerto Rico y los demás territorios sean incluidos expresamente en toda iniciativa congresional sobre la materia; y para otros fines relacionados.
What it would do: Requests that the U.S. Congress approve federal legislation establishing binding safeguards on artificial intelligence development and use, including independent safety evaluations, transparency requirements, kill-switch capabilities, whistleblower protections, civil liability standards, and autonomous agent oversight, and demands Puerto Rico and other territories be expressly included in all such congressional initiatives.
In committee
New York A 11684: Relates to the disclosure of artificial intelligence use in floor statements and debate by members of the legislature
In committee
Congress H.R. 10146: AI Advertising Disclosure Act
In committee
California SB 1146: Advertisement claims: health-related consumer products and services: digital replicas and synthetic performers.
What it would do: Requires advertisements depicting digital replicas or synthetic performers as health care providers promoting health-related consumer products to include clear, conspicuous disclosure that the provider was AI-generated or no human provider is depicted. Violations constitute unfair competition and false advertising violations.
Passed chamber
New York A 11626: Enacts the "options for search listing act"
In committee
New York A 11636: Relates to third party verification of compliance with transparency and safety requirements for developers of artificial intelligence models
What it would do: Requires large frontier AI developers to annually retain third party verifiers to assess compliance with their AI frameworks and publish verification summaries. Establishes office accreditation process for verifiers and increases civil penalties for violations to up to three million dollars.
In committee
Virginia HB 1294: Use of artificial intelligence-based tools; covered artificial intelligence, disclosure of use.
In committee
Virginia SB 365: Fostering Access, Innovation, and Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence Act; established.
In committee
Illinois HB 4248: Algorithmic price transparency
What it would do: Prohibits persons from engaging in surveillance pricing, which is offering customized prices based on personal data about consumers. Provides exceptions for cost-based pricing differences, loyalty programs, publicly disclosed eligibility criteria, and certain financial institutions.
Passed chamber
California AB 2412: State agencies or departments: public communications.
What it would do: Requires state agencies using generative AI to directly communicate with the public to include a disclaimer indicating the communication was AI-generated and provide information on contacting a human employee, with specific placement requirements based on communication type.
Passed chamber
Congress H.R. 8893: Protecting Consumers from Deceptive AI Act
What it would do: Requires the National Institute of Standards and Technology to establish task forces within 90 days to develop technical standards and guidelines for identifying and labeling audio, visual, and text-based content created by generative artificial intelligence, including watermarking and content provenance metadata.
Passed committee
Congress H.R. 9439: Voluntary Consumer AI Disclosure Pilot Act
In committee
Puerto Rico PS 622: Para crear la "Ley de Transparencia y Derecho a la Interacción Humana en Servicios Públicos Asistidos por Inteligencia Artificial", a los fines de requerir que las agendas y corporaciones públicas del Gobierno de Puerto Rico que informen a los ciudadanos cuando estén interactuando con sistemas automatizados o inteligencia artificial y garantizar el derecho a solicitar la intervención de un ser humano en la prestación de servicios públicos; y para otros fines relacionados.
What it would do: Requires Puerto Rico government agencies and public corporations to notify citizens when they interact with automated systems or artificial intelligence, and guarantees citizens the right to request human intervention in public service delivery.
Passed chamber
Congress S. 4742: AI DATA Act
In committee
Congress S. 4743: AI Bubble Transparency Act
In committee
Transparency and disclosure laws, state by state
- New York25 bills, 2 enacted
- New Jersey17 bills
- Congress17 bills
- California15 bills, 9 enacted
- Virginia10 bills, 1 enacted
- Illinois7 bills
- Pennsylvania7 bills, 1 enacted
- Texas7 bills
- Massachusetts6 bills
- Missouri5 bills
- Hawaii4 bills
- Arizona3 bills
- Puerto Rico3 bills
- Rhode Island3 bills, 1 enacted
- Washington3 bills, 1 enacted
- Florida2 bills
- Idaho2 bills
- Louisiana2 bills
- Minnesota2 bills
- Montana2 bills
- New Mexico2 bills
- Ohio2 bills
- Oklahoma2 bills
- Utah2 bills, 1 enacted
- West Virginia2 bills
- Alabama1 bill
- Arkansas1 bill, 1 enacted
- Colorado1 bill
- Georgia1 bill
- Iowa1 bill
- Kentucky1 bill
- Maryland1 bill
- Maine1 bill, 1 enacted
- Mississippi1 bill
- North Carolina1 bill
- New Hampshire1 bill
- South Carolina1 bill
- South Dakota1 bill
- Tennessee1 bill
- Vermont1 bill
Questions
Which states have transparency and disclosure laws?
States that enacted transparency and disclosure laws in 2025 and 2026: California (9), New York (2), Arkansas (1), Maine (1), Pennsylvania (1), Rhode Island (1), Utah (1), Virginia (1) and Washington (1). Laws enacted before 2025 are not listed here.
Which states have the most transparency and disclosure bills?
New York (25), New Jersey (17), Congress (17), California (15) and Virginia (10). In all, 167 bills in 40 jurisdictions, the latest action on 22 October 2026.
What do transparency and disclosure bills cover?
Duties to disclose that AI is in use or that content is AI-generated: notices to people interacting with AI, watermarks, provenance data and training data disclosure. Each enacted law above has a line on what it requires.
Is this legal advice?
No. Which bills count as transparency and disclosure bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature’s own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
More in AI Legislation
- AI Legislation TrackerEvery bill in every state and Congress, and the monthly report.
- Deepfake laws by stateThe deepfake laws and bills, by state.
- AI employment and hiring lawsThe AI employment laws and bills, by state.
- Automated decision-making lawsThe automated decision-making laws and bills, by state.
- Autonomous vehicle lawsThe autonomous vehicle laws and bills, by state.
- New laws 2027State laws taking effect next year, with their dates.
Follow transparency and disclosure bills in every state
The AI Legislation Tracker sends the bills that moved and a monthly report you can forward to a client.