Minnesota packaging and PFAS bills
Every packaging and PFAS bill in the Minnesota Legislature, what each would do, and where it stands. 21 states enacted packaging and PFAS laws in the 2025 and 2026 sessions. Minnesota has bills in progress and none enacted yet.
- Bills in scope
- 14bills in scope
- Past committee
- 1past committee
- Most recent action
- 16 April 2026most recent action
Packaging and PFAS in Minnesota, by topic
PFAS bans in products
6 bills. Enacted in 14 states.
PFAS in water, land and health
3 bills. Enacted in 16 states.
Plastics bans and bottle deposits
2 bills. Enacted in 11 states.
Packaging EPR
1 bill. Enacted in 6 states.
Recyclability and labeling claims
1 bill.
Packaging and PFAS bills in Minnesota
The bills not yet law, furthest along first, with what each would do.
1Past committee
13Introduced or inactive
14 bills in scope
Past committee
1
What it would do: Delays PFAS reporting deadline to January 1, 2028; exempts electronic components from PFAS prohibitions until January 1, 2032; delays lead-containing product prohibitions until January 1, 2028; delays PFAS firefighting foam prohibitions at airport hangars until January 1, 2028 with possible extensions.
Introduced or inactive
13
What it would do: Appropriates $5,500,000 from the environment and natural resources trust fund in fiscal year 2027 to the Pollution Control Agency for a grant to Lyon County to construct a regional demonstration project at Lyon County Regional Landfill to treat landfill leachate for PFAS, chloride, and other contaminants.
What it would do: Prohibits the commissioner and state agencies from purchasing single-use plastic food service ware and bottles with capacity not exceeding 21 fluid ounces, with exceptions for unavailable alternatives, emergencies, and purchases necessary for health, safety, welfare, or disability accommodation.
What it would do: Requires producers of textiles, carpet, and mattresses to establish and fund a collection and management system through approved producer responsibility organizations, with eco-modulated fees, collection sites in each county, and penalties up to $10,000 per day for violations.
What it would do: Exempts agricultural products, equipment, pesticides, fertilizers, and soil amendments from PFAS regulations. Repeals existing PFAS notification and registration requirements for these agricultural items under chapters 18B and 18C.
What it would do: Prohibits hotels from selling, offering for sale, or providing single-use plastic bottles containing shampoo or conditioner to customers, effective January 1, 2027. Violators face civil penalties of $50 per bottle up to $10,000 maximum, enforceable by the attorney general.
What it would do: Extends the deadline for manufacturers to submit information about products containing intentionally added PFAS from January 1, 2026 to July 1, 2027, and establishes a list of products and uses where PFAS are deemed currently unavoidable.
What it would do: Requires the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency commissioner to submit a report by February 15, 2028 assessing regulatory authority, research capabilities, funding, scientific data, other state and federal actions, and critical uses regarding fluoropolymers in consumer products.
What it would do: Appropriates $365,000 in fiscal year 2026 and $710,000 in fiscal year 2027 from the environmental fund to the Pollution Control Agency for transfer to the Department of Health to continue PFAS biomonitoring in eastern metropolitan communities.
What it would do: Requires the Pollution Control Agency to identify and report every three years on priority PFAS in Minnesota waters and sediments, develop a management protocol by January 1, 2028, and adopt water quality standards for PFOA and PFOS by January 1, 2028.
What it would do: Exempts veterinary products from Minnesota's prohibition on products containing PFAS by adding veterinary settings and products regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture to the existing exemption for medical devices and drugs.
What it would do: Appropriates $40,000,000 from bond proceeds to the Public Facilities Authority for a grant to Apple Valley to design and construct renovation and expansion of its water treatment plant to address PFAS contamination, and authorizes the state to issue bonds up to $40,000,000 to fund this appropriation.
What it would do: Appropriates $1,600,000 from bond proceeds to the Public Facilities Authority for a grant to Oak Park Heights for design and engineering of water treatment infrastructure improvements to remove PFAS from the city's drinking water supply, and authorizes the state to issue bonds up to $1,600,000 to fund this appropriation.
What it would do: Removes the January 1, 2026 effective date and the requirement that certifying entities be nonprofit corporations, while retaining requirements that certifiers promote biodegradable and compostable materials and be technically capable of analyzing product compliance.
Bill titles link to the Minnesota Legislature's own page.
What counts as packaging and PFAS legislation
In scope: Packaging EPR; pFAS bans in products; pFAS in water, land and health; plastics bans and bottle deposits; and recyclability and labeling claims.
Questions
Does Minnesota have a packaging and PFAS law?
None of the 14 packaging and PFAS bills in the Minnesota Legislature has been enacted in the 2025 and 2026 sessions. 1 bill got past a committee.
Which packaging and PFAS bills are moving in Minnesota?
1 bill not yet law has passed a committee or a chamber, the furthest along HF 1627 (passed committee).
What does Minnesota legislate on most in packaging and PFAS?
PFAS bans in products (6 bills), PFAS in water, land and health (3 bills) and Plastics bans and bottle deposits (2 bills).
Are these summaries reviewed by a lawyer?
No. Which bills count as Packaging and PFAS bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software from the bill's own text and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature's own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Other practice areas in Minnesota
- AI in Minnesota28
- Alcohol in Minnesota15
- Cannabis in Minnesota31
- Children's Online Safety in Minnesota6
- Cybersecurity in Minnesota3
- Data center and energy in Minnesota13
- Data Privacy in Minnesota21
- Employment in Minnesota42
- Healthcare in Minnesota109
- Insurance in Minnesota78
- Intellectual Property in Minnesota1
- Payments and fintech in Minnesota17
- Rental housing in Minnesota22
- Tobacco and nicotine in Minnesota2
- Transportation in Minnesota13
- All jurisdictions
Packaging and PFAS legislation in other jurisdictions
48 more currently hold bills in this tracker
- New Jersey71
- New York64
- Congress54
- Massachusetts43
- California36
- Connecticut36
- Hawaii36
- Maine29
- Illinois26
- Maryland21
- Oregon19
- Rhode Island19
- Washington18
- Michigan17
- Vermont14
- North Carolina13
- Virginia13
- Florida12
- Indiana10
- Missouri10
- Wisconsin10
- Iowa9
- New Hampshire9
- Pennsylvania9
- Georgia7
- Montana7
- Oklahoma7
- Texas7
- South Carolina5
- Colorado4
- Delaware4
- Kentucky4
- New Mexico4
- Ohio4
- Arizona3
- Nevada3
- Alaska2
- Idaho2
- Kansas2
- Mississippi2
- Puerto Rico2
- South Dakota2
- Tennessee2
- West Virginia2
- Alabama1
- Louisiana1
- Nebraska1
- Utah1
Know when Minnesota's packaging and PFAS law changes
An alert when a bill moves, and one report a month on what changed in every state and Congress.