Congress packaging and PFAS bills
Every packaging and PFAS bill in Congress, what each would do, and where it stands. 21 states enacted packaging and PFAS laws in the 2025 and 2026 sessions. Congress has bills in progress and none enacted yet.
- Bills in scope
- 54bills in scope
- Past committee
- 6past committee
- Most recent action
- 14 October 2026most recent action
Packaging and PFAS in Congress, by topic
PFAS in water, land and health
14 bills. Enacted in 16 states.
PFAS bans in products
10 bills. Enacted in 14 states.
Recyclability and labeling claims
3 bills.
Packaging EPR
1 bill. Enacted in 6 states.
Plastics bans and bottle deposits
1 bill. Enacted in 11 states.
Packaging and PFAS bills in Congress
The bills not yet law, furthest along first, with what each would do.
6Past committee
1Active in committee
47Introduced or inactive
54 bills in scope
Past committee
6
What it would do: Amends the Federal Trade Commission Act to prohibit deceptive recyclable, compostable, and reusable claims for consumer product packaging and requires such claims to be certified by accredited third-party bodies and qualified with information about program availability.
What it would do: Prohibits persons from making misleading recycled content claims when advertising, marketing, selling, or offering products to consumers. Authorizes mass balance accounting as an acceptable method for substantiating recycled content claims if compliant with third-party certification systems, and directs the FTC to update its Green Guides accordingly.
What it would do: Congress disapproves the Environmental Protection Agency rule modifying the start of the submission period for PFAS reporting and recordkeeping under TSCA 8(a)(7), published at 91 Fed. Reg. 18786 on April 13, 2026, and declares the rule shall have no force or effect.
What it would do: Establishes a pilot grant program under the EPA to award competitive grants of $500,000 to $15,000,000 to states, local governments, tribes, and public-private partnerships to improve recycling accessibility in underserved communities through infrastructure like transfer stations and curbside collection programs.
What it would do: Requires the EPA Administrator to prepare and publicly release a report within 2 years on the feasibility and best practices of reuse and refill systems across various sectors, including evaluation of system types, equitable distribution, job creation, economic impacts, support needs, and implementation barriers.
What it would do: Establishes a pilot grant program awarding $500,000 to $15,000,000 per grant to states, local governments, tribes, and public-private partnerships to improve recycling accessibility in underserved communities. Requires EPA to collect and report data on recycling and composting infrastructure, programs, and end-market sales.
Active in committee
1
What it would do: Requires the Secretary concerned to characterize separations from the Armed Forces solely based on pseudofolliculitis barbae as honorable discharges and allows such separated members to receive veterans benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs regardless of minimum active-duty service requirements.
Introduced or inactive
18 of 47 shown
What it would do: Establishes a Firefighter PFAS Injury Compensation Program providing compensation to firefighters with PFAS-related health conditions, funded by a PFAS Trust Fund supported by 10 percent excise taxes on PFAS products and PFAS litigation awards.
What it would do: Creates national standards for labeling packaging, food service products, and beverage containers as recyclable, compostable, reusable, or refillable, with EPA and FTC establishing standardized labels and enforcement mechanisms for deceptive labeling practices.
What it would do: Directs the EPA Administrator to study the feasibility of establishing a standardized national database tracking recyclable materials, recycling infrastructure capacity, material recovery outcomes, landfill diversion, underserved areas, and extended producer responsibility program performance, and to establish such database if feasible within one year of submitting the report.
What it would do: Establishes a Federal working group composed of representatives from EPA, FTC, NIST, and other agencies to develop recommendations for increasing post-consumer resin use and improving measurement, traceability, and reporting of recycled plastic content across packaging, construction, infrastructure, and automotive sectors.
What it would do: Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, effective January 1, 2027. Defines PFAS as fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom.
What it would do: Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit cosmetics from containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, effective January 1, 2027, and repeals a related provision from the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022.
What it would do: Establishes a grant program through the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health to fund research and development of PFAS-free turnout gear for firefighters, and authorizes funding for training programs on safe use and decontamination of such gear.
What it would do: Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem 14 categories of chemicals unsafe for use as food contact substances, including phthalates, PFAS, bisphenols, and others. Requires the Secretary to consider effects on vulnerable populations when evaluating alternative substances, effective 2 years after enactment.
What it would do: Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem 15 specific chemical classes and substances unsafe for use in food contact materials, including ortho-phthalates, PFAS, bisphenols, and others, effective 2 years after enactment, while allowing states to impose stricter standards.
What it would do: Requires the EPA Administrator to report on composting and recycling infrastructure, prepare an inventory of materials recovery facilities every 4 years, and develop national recycling rates. Authorizes $4,000,000 annually through 2029 for these activities.
What it would do: Imposes a 45 percent excise tax on sales of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances by manufacturers, producers, or importers, and establishes a 25 percent tax credit for expenditures to remove these substances from public water systems where contamination exceeds EPA maximum contaminant levels.
What it would do: Requires the EPA Administrator to promulgate a final rule within 60 days prohibiting the discharge of plastic pellets or other pre-production plastic materials from plastic polymer production facilities, plastic molding facilities, and other point sources that make, use, package, or transport such materials.
What it would do: Phases out nonessential perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances over 10 years, prohibits releases above detection thresholds, requires manufacturer reporting, establishes research centers, and modifies liability statutes for hazardous substance exposure claims.
What it would do: Phases out nonessential perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) over 10 years, prohibits releases above detection thresholds, requires manufacturer reporting, establishes research centers, and modifies liability statutes for PFAS exposure claims.
What it would do: Requires the EPA Administrator to promulgate a final rule within 60 days prohibiting the discharge of plastic pellets or other pre-production plastic materials from facilities regulated under federal regulations and from point sources that make, use, package, or transport such materials, and to reflect these prohibitions in wastewater and stormwater permits and performance standards.
Showing the 25 furthest along of 54. Subscribers see all of them, filtered and searchable. Bill titles link to Congress's own page.
What counts as packaging and PFAS legislation
In scope: Packaging EPR; pFAS bans in products; pFAS in water, land and health; plastics bans and bottle deposits; and recyclability and labeling claims.
Questions
Does Congress have a packaging and PFAS law?
None of the 54 packaging and PFAS bills in Congress has been enacted in the 2025 and 2026 sessions. 6 bills got past a committee.
Which packaging and PFAS bills are moving in Congress?
6 bills not yet law have passed a committee or a chamber, the furthest along H.R. 6832 (passed committee), H.R. 7502 (passed committee) and S.J.Res. 187 (passed committee).
What does Congress legislate on most in packaging and PFAS?
PFAS in water, land and health (14 bills), PFAS bans in products (10 bills) and Recyclability and labeling claims (3 bills).
Are these summaries reviewed by a lawyer?
No. Which bills count as Packaging and PFAS bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software from the bill's own text and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature's own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Other practice areas in Congress
- AI in Congress363
- Alcohol in Congress16
- Cannabis in Congress32
- Children's Online Safety in Congress50
- Cybersecurity in Congress177
- Data center and energy in Congress61
- Data Privacy in Congress151
- Employment in Congress476
- Healthcare in Congress836
- Insurance in Congress48
- Intellectual Property in Congress70
- Payments and fintech in Congress61
- Rental housing in Congress30
- Tobacco and nicotine in Congress11
- Transportation in Congress101
- All jurisdictions
Packaging and PFAS legislation in other jurisdictions
48 more currently hold bills in this tracker
- New Jersey71
- New York64
- Massachusetts43
- California36
- Connecticut36
- Hawaii36
- Maine29
- Illinois26
- Maryland21
- Oregon19
- Rhode Island19
- Washington18
- Michigan17
- Minnesota14
- Vermont14
- North Carolina13
- Virginia13
- Florida12
- Indiana10
- Missouri10
- Wisconsin10
- Iowa9
- New Hampshire9
- Pennsylvania9
- Georgia7
- Montana7
- Oklahoma7
- Texas7
- South Carolina5
- Colorado4
- Delaware4
- Kentucky4
- New Mexico4
- Ohio4
- Arizona3
- Nevada3
- Alaska2
- Idaho2
- Kansas2
- Mississippi2
- Puerto Rico2
- South Dakota2
- Tennessee2
- West Virginia2
- Alabama1
- Louisiana1
- Nebraska1
- Utah1
Know when Congress's packaging and PFAS law changes
An alert when a bill moves, and one report a month on what changed in every state and Congress.