Michigan payments and fintech laws
What Michigan has enacted on payments and fintech, what each law requires, and what the bills still moving would do. Michigan is one of 42 states that enacted a payments and fintech law in the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
- Bills in scope
- 28bills in scope
- Past committee
- 16past committee
- Most recent action
- 6 October 2026most recent action
Payments and fintech laws enacted in Michigan
One payments and fintech law enacted in the Michigan Legislature in the 2025 and 2026 sessions, newest first. Each links to the legislature's own page.
- HB 4599Crimes: organized; certain definitions related to gift card fraud; provide for. Amends 2012 PA 455 (MCL 752.1081 - 752.1087) by adding sec. 3a. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4598'25Enacted 6 October 2026
What it does: Adds definitions to Michigan's organized retail crime law: gift card (physical or digital, activated or inactivated), gift card redemption information (unique access data), issuer (person issuing gift cards), and seller (merchant selling gift cards).
Payment fraud and scams
Payments and fintech in Michigan, by topic
Money transmission and licensing
11 bills. Enacted in 24 states.
Earned wage access
8 bills. Enacted in 7 states.
Virtual currency and crypto kiosks
7 bills. Enacted in 34 states.
Card surcharges and payment fees
2 bills. Enacted in 14 states.
Interchange and card networks
2 bills. Enacted in 6 states.
Payment fraud and scams
1 bill, 1 enacted. Enacted in 21 states.
Payments and fintech bills in Michigan
The bills not yet law, furthest along first, with what each would do.
1Enacted
15Past committee
12Introduced or inactive
28 bills in scope
Past committee
15
What it would do: Amends the Consumer Financial Services Act to update internal references and definitions related to financial licensing acts, including replacing references to the money transmission services act with the money transmission modernization act, and updating bureau and commissioner title references.
What it would do: Amends the Deferred Presentment Service Transactions Act to revise internal references and definitions, including updating references to the money transmission services act through June 30, 2026, and the new money transmission modernization act. Takes effect January 1, 2026, contingent on House Bill 5544 being enacted.
What it would do: Amends the Consumer Financial Services Act to revise internal references for money transmission services by replacing a reference to the money transmission services act definition with a direct reference to section 2 of that act, and makes minor grammatical corrections to net worth requirements and related provisions.
What it would do: Amends the Consumer Financial Services Act to revise internal references to the money transmission services act, changing references from section 13(5)(b) 67 of the money transmission services modernization act and updating related terminology throughout the surety bond requirements section.
What it would do: Amends the Consumer Financial Services Act to revise internal references and clarify language in provisions authorizing the commissioner to prohibit persons engaged in fraud or money laundering from employment by financial licensees, including references to money transmission services as defined in the money transmission services act.
What it would do: Prohibits any person from installing, operating, or allowing cryptocurrency kiosks on premises they own, lease, or control. Violators face civil infractions with fines of $2,000 to $5,000 for first violations and $5,000 to $10,000 for subsequent violations.
What it would do: Amends the Money Transmission Services Act to exempt persons licensed under the earned wage access services act from money transmitter requirements, to the extent of their operation as licensees under that act.
What it would do: Exempts earned wage access services that comply with the earned wage access services act from the regulation of wages and fringe benefits under Michigan's wage payment law. Takes effect only if House Bill 5558 is enacted.
What it would do: Exempts persons licensed under the earned wage access services act from the requirement to obtain a license under the deferred presentment service transactions act, to the extent they operate as licensees under that act.
What it would do: Amends the Credit Reform Act to exclude persons licensed to provide earned wage access services from the definition of 'regulated lender.' Takes effect only if House Bill No. 5558 is enacted.
What it would do: Amends the Regulatory Loan Act to exempt business transacted pursuant to a license under the earned wage access services act from the act's requirements. Takes effect only if House Bill No. 5558 is enacted.
What it would do: Amends the interest rate law to exempt earned wage access services licensed under the earned wage access services act from usury restrictions.
What it would do: Exempts earned wage access services licensed under the earned wage access services act from the criminal usury law. Takes effect only if House Bill No. 5558 is enacted.
Introduced or inactive
10 of 12 shown
What it would do: Adds to Michigan's consumer protection act a prohibition on requiring buyers to pay by credit or refusing to accept legal tender in retail sales of goods or services conducted in person.
What it would do: Prohibits merchants from disclosing merchant category codes that identify or distinguish particular goods or services in transactions, and prohibits payment card networks from processing such codes. Authorizes the attorney general to investigate violations and seek injunctions after providing 30 days to remedy.
What it would do: Adds violation of sections 5, 7, 9, or 11 of the cryptocurrency exchange kiosk regulation act to the list of unfair trade practices under the Michigan consumer protection act. Takes effect 90 days after enactment, contingent on House Bill 6222 being enacted.
What it would do: Prohibits any person from operating a virtual currency kiosk in Michigan or allowing one to operate on premises they own, lease, or control. Violations are felonies punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment, fines up to $50,000 or 3 times transaction amounts, or up to 10 years if involving vulnerable adults or losses exceeding $50,000.
What it would do: Prohibits any person from installing, operating, or allowing cryptocurrency kiosks on premises they own, lease, or control. Violators face civil fines up to $100 per day and potential suspension of lottery sales agent licenses for 90 days.
What it would do: Allows insurance agencies and producers to collect fees from insureds for credit card, debit card, electronic funds transfer, and other electronic payments, limited to actual costs incurred, with required advance notice and option to pay by check without fee.
What it would do: Creates the Money Transmission Modernization Act to regulate money transmission businesses, requiring licensing of persons engaged in money transmission, establishing safety and soundness requirements, and repealing the 2006 Money Transmission Services Act effective July 1, 2026.
What it would do: Prohibits money transmission licensees and authorized delegates from initiating foreign remittance transfers unless they verify the sender is not an unauthorized alien, with civil fines of 25% of transfer amounts for violations and quarterly reporting requirements to the department.
What it would do: Creates the Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act requiring operators to disclose material risks, terms, conditions, and fraud warnings to customers; use blockchain analytics; maintain antifraud and compliance policies; designate compliance and consumer protection officers; provide customer service; and submit quarterly reports to the Department of Insurance and Financial Services.
Showing the 25 furthest along of 27. Subscribers see all of them, filtered and searchable. Bill titles link to the Michigan Legislature's own page.
What counts as payments and fintech legislation
In scope: Money transmission and licensing; virtual currency and crypto kiosks; card surcharges and payment fees; interchange and card networks; earned wage access; bNPL and bank partnerships; prepaid, gift cards and P2P; and payment fraud and scams.
Questions
Does Michigan have a payments and fintech law?
Yes. Michigan enacted 1 payments and fintech law in the 2025 and 2026 sessions, among them HB 4599. Each is listed on this page with what it requires.
Which payments and fintech bills are moving in Michigan?
15 bills not yet law have passed a committee or a chamber, the furthest along HB 5544 (passed chamber), HB 5545 (passed chamber) and HB 5546 (passed chamber).
What does Michigan legislate on most in payments and fintech?
Money transmission and licensing (11 bills), Earned wage access (8 bills) and Virtual currency and crypto kiosks (7 bills).
Are these summaries reviewed by a lawyer?
No. Which bills count as Payments and fintech bills, and the line on what each law requires or each bill would do, are drafted by software from the bill's own text and not reviewed by an attorney. Every bill links to the legislature's own record: read the text before relying on it. The list covers bills from the 2025 and 2026 sessions.
Other practice areas in Michigan
- AI in Michigan14
- Alcohol in Michigan39
- Cannabis in Michigan22
- Children's Online Safety in Michigan8
- Cybersecurity in Michigan10
- Data center and energy in Michigan35
- Data Privacy in Michigan24
- Employment in Michigan135
- Healthcare in Michigan99
- Insurance in Michigan137
- Intellectual Property in Michigan8
- Packaging and PFAS in Michigan17
- Rental housing in Michigan38
- Tobacco and nicotine in Michigan15
- Transportation in Michigan10
- All jurisdictions
Payments and fintech legislation in other jurisdictions
51 more currently hold bills in this tracker
- New Jersey66
- Congress61
- New York38
- Texas32
- Massachusetts27
- Oklahoma24
- Mississippi21
- Florida20
- Illinois18
- Missouri18
- Connecticut17
- Minnesota17
- Maryland16
- California15
- Hawaii13
- West Virginia13
- Arizona12
- Iowa12
- Louisiana12
- Montana12
- Pennsylvania12
- Rhode Island12
- Virginia12
- Indiana11
- Maine11
- Washington11
- Nebraska10
- Tennessee10
- Delaware9
- Kentucky9
- Utah9
- Arkansas8
- Georgia8
- South Carolina8
- Vermont8
- Wisconsin8
- Idaho7
- North Carolina7
- Ohio7
- Alaska6
- Colorado6
- Kansas6
- New Hampshire6
- South Dakota6
- Alabama5
- Puerto Rico5
- Nevada4
- Wyoming4
- North Dakota3
- New Mexico3
- Oregon3
Know when Michigan's payments and fintech law changes
An alert when a bill moves, and one report a month on what changed in every state and Congress.